2007-01-10 08:26:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It's Vietnam all over again! DejaVu!
2007-01-10 08:31:54 · answer #1 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because few understand Bush's agenda, or understand that no matter what the U.S. does, there will be untold numbers of casualties on BOTH sides. It is too bad that the laws aren't different. That Bush, his cronies, the neocons, and all of those who follow him, be forced to don a uniform, shoulder a rifle and step into some boots.
And at the end of January, 2007, instead of "20,000 troops", that the "surge" (which is basically the same as an "escalation") be led and fought by the very same people who will allow it.
Bush, his cronies, the neocons and all those who follow them.
2007-01-10 17:13:17 · answer #2 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dubbya doesn;t want to risk hurting the oil.
In case you had not noticed, they are not fighting a war. if they were fighting a war they would have won and been home years ago.
They are making the middle east a comfy place for Dubbya and his oil buddies to go consort after his term in office is finally over.
2007-01-10 16:32:03 · answer #3 · answered by aural_exstacy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you serious? In Viet Nam often we had to have the permission of the area chief to do anything because the yellow bellied, lilly livered politicos were running things. At least our Commander in Chief is allowing his OFFICERS and SENIOR ENLISTED to do what they're trained to do: TAKE OUT THE ENEMY.
2007-01-10 16:53:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we have to let Iraq stand up on their own.
2007-01-10 16:31:56 · answer #5 · answered by Eugene D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
PC, political correctness. Also, if CNN, MSNBC and Fox news werent there, im sure it would be a whole different operation.
2007-01-10 18:27:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋