Because if so fine. Critical analysis of evolution :Mounds of evidence for. No evidence against.
creationism: no evidence for. Says that plants where made before the sun this is impossible. States that the world is only 6,002 years old which we know to be untrue. Says that only 2 people where created this we know isn't enough genetic diversity to allow a species to continue. Contradictory and scientifically inaccurate though out. So from a critical analysis of evolution we come to the conclusion yes evolution occurred but a critical analysis of creationism shows that it is complete and utter rubbish. Yep I'm fine with teaching kids that. Are you?
2007-01-10 07:32:50 · 5 answers · asked by Say no to jesus 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Don't forget the anthropological evidence that the creation myth is taken from earlier texts, and the "christian" creationists aren't even looking at the original myth.
2007-01-10 07:37:56 · answer #1 · answered by vertical732 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ah, the problem is that once you start explaining the entire thing as one big miracle, you can't critically examine it. Miracles, by their definition, don't follow the laws of science or logic.
2007-01-10 07:35:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, except it would never be taught that way. There would be a whole lot of "It's fact! It says so in the book! That's all the 'proof' you need! Just believe...."
2007-01-10 07:40:34 · answer #3 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course.
2007-01-10 07:40:52 · answer #4 · answered by S K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your choice but why are you on this section?
2007-01-10 07:55:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋