Peace and Love
2007-01-10 04:01:10 · 12 answers · asked by digilook 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
uh......... He did provide. Go back and reread Genesis. It was provided as soon as it was needed.
2007-01-10 04:17:08 · answer #1 · answered by epaphras_faith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the story goes, once they ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, they knew shame, which is one form of being self absorbed. Being self absorbed they needed clothing. If they had made the choice to be faithful to God and to be good guardians of all his creation as he planned, they would not have needed clothing because they would not have been self-obsessed.
2007-01-10 12:09:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clothing was made to protect people from harm, elements etc..., show rank in society, and prevent people from allowing their hormones to interfere with society. It is an ethical decision. Not out of shame or guilt. Would you like your 14 year old daughter to go out with her areas showing? Would you really care to see younger people with it showing?
We symbolize nudity with sexuality and it has become a sacred act not a shameful one. Blame society if you're a nudist.
I'm sure in the when cave men we're trowing rocks at each other they realized animal skin was tough to penetrate and proved a form of protection. I'm sure shame played no part look at african and other native tribes. It is solely a society based ideal not on shame but, ethics to prevent rape, distraction, lust, protect, rank.
We value our bodies so we cover them. Why do you keep precious baseball cards in a case?
2007-01-10 12:09:58 · answer #3 · answered by obscure 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes!, along with tons of other mistakes, for example not providing and I-pod for each, jaja.
Ok, what are you thinking? this question deserves an award, really.
2007-01-10 12:06:35 · answer #4 · answered by alkorda 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No mistake. Before Adam and Eve had sex with the snake there was no need for clothing.
2007-01-10 12:06:41 · answer #5 · answered by Eva 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. It leads too many people to think that there's nothing wrong with the human body, and to approve of Nudism. We can't have that!
2007-01-10 12:05:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, the Bible indicates that it's only because of sin are we ashamed of our nakedness. Clothing is one of the many consequences of that sin.
By the way, you may disagree with my answer, but that's because of your philosophal presupposition that the Bible is not to be believed. My philosophical presupposition is that it is. Given my presupposition, my answer is perfectly logical.
2007-01-10 12:05:01 · answer #7 · answered by Gary B 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve didn't know they were naked until they dis-obeyed God.
2007-01-10 12:06:08 · answer #8 · answered by B"Quotes 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Humans mad the mistake thinking that nudity is shameful.
2007-01-10 12:05:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why, conditions did not require it.
2007-01-10 12:07:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋