2007-01-10 01:59:02 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nope. That which does not exist, does not eat.
2007-01-10 02:02:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You're really tempting fate, and my dark side, with the "serious" tag. However . . .
The use of language here is going to be our failing. We will not be able to agree on common definitions of the eleven words in your question, so the question itself is too "loaded", so to speak.
Some will argue "can" and "God" can only exist together in a statement like, "God can", but never in a question. In fact to question any possible action of God is either foolish, pointless or sacriligious, depending on individual religion.
Logically, the problem is all linguistic. If we ask, "Is the color blue actually blue?", the answer is "No" because it exists beyond our definition of it, but "Yes" because it can only be defined by the word's definition.
The real questions, I fear, are : "If God can eat us, what becomes of us?", "If God doesn't eat us, what else gets eaten?", & of course, "Wouldn't it be wise of us to eat God first?"
"And lo I gazed into the face of God . . .but the mirror broke."
2007-01-10 10:19:47 · answer #2 · answered by LWS Heathcliff 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think they are called a flock??? Why are churches calling people sheep???????? Because they are supper!
You think they aren't being eaten? 5.000,000 children vanish into thin air every year. that's a huge number. Why are they not found?
Why do secret governments and secret religious societies exist?
I'm a crackpot. I'm a moron. I'm unbelievable.
Wake up and look around.
2007-01-10 10:09:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God is not a SHE he is a masculine figure and He does not have to eat. Jesus existed most definately and those defaming Him, will see Him pass them by when He fetches His bride, the reborn christians
2007-01-10 10:08:21 · answer #4 · answered by Andre G 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If this were a serious question, then it would deserve a serious answer.
2007-01-10 10:11:13 · answer #5 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure I'll give you one as soon as you ask a serious question.
2007-01-10 10:02:40 · answer #6 · answered by toff 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you want serious answers ask serious questions.
God is a he not she.
God creates people. He creates the world. God is a spirit- does he really have to eat?
He can create food. DuH.
2007-01-10 10:04:34 · answer #7 · answered by yournotalone 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She subsists on the love and adoration of her subjects, so she wouldn't need to. lol
2007-01-10 10:02:28 · answer #8 · answered by I hate friggin' crybabies 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The Creature has amassed such awesome wealth... maybe It can eat Itself"
2007-01-10 10:03:34 · answer #9 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, a mother can never eat her child..................................... lol
2007-01-10 10:04:24 · answer #10 · answered by network7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋