They eat only the nectar of acacia trees. So how did they survive a year on the ark. Also, how the heck did they manage to walk from Central America to the ark. even if there was a lnad bridge, they would have had to bring the tree along for food,
2007-01-10
01:26:14
·
15 answers
·
asked by
mullah robertson
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Jan K you have hit the nail on the head. Christians must either discard the notion of the flood or discard the notion that evolution is false. Take your pick.
2007-01-10
01:36:19 ·
update #1
I love Ark questions
2007-01-10 01:29:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sean 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Did ants 'evolve' separately, or did they come from an original type of ant? HELLO? Is anyone home? Many types of insects and animals adapted to their environment when that was the only food type they could get. Do you think Koala bears always had their lousy diet of Eucalyptus leaves? The Panda bear and Bamboo shoots? The ones who were tolerant of the diet survived, the rest died, leaving only the ones tolerant of the change in diet. Keep trying.....face it, only mindless drones believe in the evolution media ploy. OPEN YOUR MIND.
2016-05-23 03:47:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And how did the platypus duck bill get from Australia to the Middle East and back again with no break in the fossil record. Because it was a myth.
2007-01-10 01:30:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's just a story. It's not real. It's a myth. It's not even an original myth. It's based on an older Babylonian myth about a river flooding and a merchant saving his livestock by building a raft.
2007-01-10 01:29:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You could (and possibly do) spend weeks thinking about all the contradictions in what is essentially a book similar to Aesop's Fables.
2007-01-10 01:29:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If there were no Eucalyptus trees how did the koalas survive?
2007-01-10 01:33:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Prophet ENSLAVEMENTALITY (pbuh) 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like the rest of the bible, this is a nice fable, and if you want to believe the bible do not think ever.
2007-01-10 01:32:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Noah hand fed the ants salami.
2007-01-10 01:29:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Noah’s deluge. To understand you have to start with Gen.6:1.
Gen.6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
The word “men” is Heb. (ha-adham) means “the man Adam” or his progeny. The word “them” is referring to Adam and Eve. The scripture is talking about Adam and Eve’s clan and not mankind. Mankind a subject for another time.
Gen.6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
The term “sons of God” means angels or fallen angels. The word “men” again means Adam and Eve’s progeny or clan. Satan was trying to corrupt God’s plan. That is, from umbilical cord to umbilical cord would come Christ. This is why Eve is called “the mother of all living”.
Gen.6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
The word “perfect” Heb. (tamin) means “without blemish as to breed or pedigree”.
Gen.6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
The word “earth” Heb. (erets) means “land”, not the whole earth. Besides God says, “to destroy all flesh” in Adam’s clan.
Gen.7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
Gen.8:11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
If the entire globe had been under water 150 days, where did this olive leaf (pluckt off) come from.
Gen 9:11 And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
Remember what God said in Gen.6:17, “to destroy all flesh”. Here God makes a covenant with Noah and his sons. Neither shall all flesh be cut off any more. Neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. Two floods. One for flesh, Noah’s deluge. One to destroy the earth back in Gen.1:2. The global flood is a subject for another time.
Some consider the plateau of Pamir to be the original Eden. This probably was the homeland of Adam's descendants up until the time of the Flood. Today it’s known as the Tarim Basin or Eastern Turkestan. This region is surrounded by a ridge of very high mountains forming a gigantic basin in the midst of them. It measures 1,000 miles long and is about 350 miles wide.
Ussher’s Chronology says 2348 B.C., Davidson says November 2345 B.C. to November 2344 B.C. for Noah’s deluge.
Records of the Sumerians in Mesopotamia., their King Lists date to about 3350 B.C., and show an ongoing civilization well through the period of the flood. Egypt felt nothing of the deluge, they had an uninterrupted succession of Dynasties. China's civilization during the Yao Dynasty (between 2400 B.C. – 2200 B.C.) with no record of a cataclysmic interruption.
So Noah’s deluge was a local flood. But there was a global flood in Gen.1:2. Study II Pet.3:5-7, Jer.4:23-27.
Psa.104:6 Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains. Psa.104:7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.
Gen 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
2007-01-10 01:30:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Eggs floated.
2007-01-10 01:29:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋