seeing that textual critics can't agree on which works of Shakespear, if any, were written by Shakespear; isn't it rediculous to want people to believe that a textual critic descerned the number of groups of authors, their petnames for the divine, and their motivations for writing after 3-4000 years.
2007-01-09 23:33:42 · 3 answers · asked by Sammer (Jim W) 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Never mind Shakespeare and the Vietnam War. I need someone to textual rewrite your question.
k1
2007-01-09 23:45:58 · answer #1 · answered by Kenneth G 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Is it the message or the messenger that's important?
What if a purple slime monster yelled at you to get out of the way because a bus was about to hit you, would you stand in the same spot and yell at him " hey you are purple and that's not a bus, it's a truck." SPLAT!
What difference does it make if he was purple? More importantly he was telling you that something bad was coming your way and you had the opportunity to avoid it, but you wouldn't listen 'cause you were too busy finding fault with the messenger and his ability to correctly label the thing that was coming.
Peace.
.
2007-01-10 07:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by LadyB!™ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never mind Shakespeare, the three places that claimed to have made Evis's favorite recipe for fried chicken all have different recipes!
If something as simple as a recipe can be screwed up less that 30 years after the King's death, how reliable can a book of bronze-age jewish mythology be?
2007-01-10 07:39:38 · answer #3 · answered by Yoda Greene 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋