i say not untill hell freezes over, and then still no!
how can he be allowed to create a life when he took one! and at the taxpayers expense!
2007-01-09 23:18:52 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
it was been discussed in the news this morning, i think he is taking his case to the court of human rights!
2007-01-09 23:41:58 · update #1
I thought this was a wind up until I checked the BBC site.
I dread to think how much the legal-aid parasites have cost tax payers so far.
When an old person has to sell her house to pay for care or hospitals avoid giving appointments because it adds to waiting lists one can reflect on the scum that benefit from our perverse system.
The legal framework is designed by lawyers to contain maximum uncertainty and ambiguity in order to maximise their professional income. To be expected when the PM and his wife are lawyers.
As you said, this should be done after flying pigs have bought ice skates for their trips to Hell.
2007-01-09 23:56:00 · answer #1 · answered by Clive 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
UK: I have been reading the previous answers and fully agree with Clive. It appears to me from the rushed news this morning, that the Human Rights Court decision has come down and that he will not be allowed IVF to father a child. However, the Judge did say that under the law, he should be allowed to have a family life - whatever that means. I do not see why they cannot have his sperm frozen and his wife's eggs and later if and when he is released and he can afford the doctors costs, it could then be done. However, I would not like to be his child and grow up knowing the circumstances............
Incidentally, if capital punishment was still about over here, the question would never arise. A prime example is that Saddam will never father, or indeed murder, another child..............
2007-01-10 01:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by thomasrobinsonantonio 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Although I don't know the circumstances around this particular case, I am shocked if he is allowed to father a child through IVF. I wouldn't want a Dad who was a murderer, doesn't anybody consider the child?
I agree with your point of view; why should he be allowed to create a life when he took one. I wonder how the family of the victim feels about it?
2007-01-09 23:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by Miranda Elizabeth 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This guy is in prison on the charge of murder. If the sins are passed from father to son do we really want him donating to the gene pool? If he is in prison do we really want another fatherless child in the streets or on welfare?
The next thing you are going to tell us is that he is a noble and has no son to take his barronship throughout time.
This clown has no business bringing life into the world. England needs to re-institute the death penalty.
2007-01-10 01:48:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not. There is no way he could help support the child in any way, and, if the child becomes aware of who/what his father is, it is a stigma that I wouldn't wish on anyone. I know of one child that is facing that. His father was executed and his mother is scared too death that her child will find out who his real father was and why he really died. The executed man was a druggie and a murderer. What a horrible thing for a child to hear about his father!
2007-01-10 00:47:11 · answer #5 · answered by lucy7 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am interested inthe criminal mind and it depends on how and what he did. if it was accident then yeah he should if he is alright to leave prison in a few years.
but then u have the real murderers who have been born with a deficiant brain and lacks all concepts of reality and guilt. they are the ppl who should be locked away and to never have kids as his genes will be passed down. i believe these sort of ppl should be sent away so no inbreads like this should ever walk the earth they r evil. lol
2007-01-09 23:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by sarah 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I find the idea distasteful.
There is a much bigger point. Putting a criminal in jail punishes the family as well as the offender. Is it fair to hurt members of the family who did not commit the crime? Leaving aside your issue, children of women prisoners, particularly young children, get badly damaged.
Many prisoners lose their families as a result of being incarcerated, which makes it more difficult for them to go straight when they are released.
2007-01-10 01:07:50 · answer #7 · answered by Philosophical Fred 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. He was trying to fight the decision saying it went against his human rights to not be allowed to have a baby with his wife even though he is in prison for murder.
I think it was rather against his victim's human rights to have had their life taken away from them. (I have to say though, that I know nothing about the case he is inside for.)
An edit after reading another post: He met his wife while she was also inside through a prison pen pal scheme, so when they met and were married then she knew that he was in prison for life and that would include her child bearing years. She made her decision to be married this man with this knowledge.
2007-01-09 23:33:07 · answer #8 · answered by Jooles 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Like father like son
2007-01-10 06:09:05 · answer #9 · answered by wise5557 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way, hes supposed to in punishment not be ale to father a child, and how the hell does he think hes going to support it, or are we, including the ivf treament
2007-01-09 23:34:45 · answer #10 · answered by button moon 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋