English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and his followers captured Spain to India in 100 years, through bloody invasions, but insist that islam allows fighting for defense only.

2007-01-09 17:08:28 · 13 answers · asked by Mari Flor 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

Easily!

They are in DENIAL !

2007-01-09 17:12:48 · answer #1 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 2 3

Arabian Peninsula is mostly desolated deserts. Its harsh environment is not so attractive to migrants and most that travel the Peninsula are nomads and gypsies like the Bedouins, In most cases, the place is alway filled with sheep herders and farmers. Very few are fighters. Since these are virtually almost empty of enemy to fight against, I have not doubt they can capture the whole area in less than ten years.
Islam allows fighting for defense only and the best defense is an offense. They will provoke the enemy just as what they did with 9/11 situation, when the enemy responds, they come out now as depending their country. Although Islamic religious teaching has nothing to do with it. The religion just fell into the wrong hands.

2007-01-10 01:32:43 · answer #2 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 0 1

You need to read the history of the Arabs before you claim these things. When claiming provide proof. Most of Arabia and North Africa belonged to the Byzantines. Byzantines started a series of aggressive wars against the Muslims and Muslims beat them back against incredible odds. As for India, it was the same case but with the Sassanids. As for Spain, same thing because the Spanish were raiding the African Coast.

2007-01-10 03:08:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

DO some research before you come up with such questions. I hate all those stereotypes that ignorant people hold as facts. See how many died from the crusades that were funded by the church, the Christian at that time got tired of it because they figured it all out!! it was about money and power and had nothing to do with religion. They posed a really good question which was "if God wanted us to fight all those wars why are we losing?" They realized that it was not God's will and the Church lost their support. Read some history please.

2007-01-10 02:57:20 · answer #4 · answered by shosho 2 · 0 0

You and most Muslim haters have a very sick and perverted perception of Muslims and Islam. To answer your question is a waste of time because you will think of some way to twist the answer. Better for you to remain ignorant of the truth because you'll be happy believing you're right and better then the Muslims. You're asking a loaded question so you think you already know the answer, even though I can tell you right now: YOU'RE WRONG!

2007-01-10 01:28:21 · answer #5 · answered by Mustafa 5 · 0 1

There proud of conquest. They think a show of strength is important. Look at the middle east everything is based in tribal power. Leader like Sadam was a effective leader by using brutality. Same with Hezbollah and hammas. Same with Iran's president. They rule with fear.

2007-01-10 01:17:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That region of the world believes in bloody warfare at the drop of a hat. It's something to be proud of there.

2007-01-10 01:15:43 · answer #7 · answered by DC 2 · 1 1

Arabia became Muslim with the unifiation of it's People, don't be fooled, Early muslims went through hell and had many invasions.

2007-01-10 01:13:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Why argue with someone like you-----your mind is set like stone.

I am not a Muslim, but, I am also educated.

2007-01-10 02:43:26 · answer #9 · answered by Shossi 6 · 0 0

They would surely deny. Because they are taught that way by their imams.

2007-01-10 01:17:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Why You Are Angry Of That, You Poor Mind.?!

2007-01-10 01:23:26 · answer #11 · answered by ◄MuslimRiverحبيبي رسول الله► 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers