Is it "wrong" to have children without being married?

Question

Give me your reasons please.

Answer 1

no i do not think it is wrong to have achild without being married b-cuz......Some people think that marriage just ruins u'r life.....but if u do want a child with u'r lover then go for it who cares wat others think...its u'r life desicion!!!


to tell u the truth i really dont care if some one is marrie or not.....go for what U want!!!

Answer 2

Nope not "wrong" because everyone is different. I do think that it's very difficult raising children alone. And male and female children BOTH need both quality male and female role models to grow up with. It is also finacnally more difficult alone. You don't have benefit of a two income home, Yeah you might be able to get child support but who will be paying the collge tuition. With loan companies now requiring that student loans be paid in full within a year of graduating and scholarships getting fewer and farther in between it's going to be more difficult getting into college. And it is getting to where ALL employers are requiering at the very least a two year degree for an entry level position that pays just a bit more than minimum wage If you want to be paid more you'd better have at least a four year degree...so no, being a single parent isn't "wrong" sometimes it's not too bright though. I'm a Christian too but I don't beleive that marriage and having sex have that much to do with each nor do marriage and having children. I don't beleive that sex is solely for procreation and that only married people should partake. Because not EVERYONE on this planet WANTS to get married or SHOULD be married but they shouldn't be forced to go without enjoying sex...Sex is also for RECREATION...
And I will also point out to the "bible thumpers" that not EVERYONE on the planet is a Christian...I find it amusing how Christians are the first to lay down judgement against other fanatic religious factions and yet they pull the same stunts trying to gain control of the the population on this planet.

Answer 3

There is no general rule of right and wrong when it comes to having children. If you can love the child, feed it, shelter it, clothe it, protect it, and help it grow up to be a healthy adult, you're qualified to be a good parent. Some people think it's better to be married. I think it's easier on parents if there's 2 people to help raise the child, but single parents and co-habitating couples have been doing a great job for years. Sometimes 2 married people can harm a child far more than 1 caring person or 2 unmarried people. It's not a marriage certificate that makes a good parent.

Answer 4

I was married for over 10 years and divorced because we couldn't have children. It ruined the marriage and made us horrible towards each other.

A year later I fell in love w/a wonderful man and thought the problem having children laid with me since I was unable to conceive after trying every medical option for years.

One day, I found out I was pregnant. I can't tell you how incredibly happy I was - even though divorced and alone. My new guy was also excited and we've been happy together ever since.

We're about to be married soon, and I wouldn't change it or take it all back for anything in the world. My child means everything to me, and I'd do it all over again just to have her.

Answer 5

Wrong or right is relative to a certain standard. Religions, laws and social are some of them.

Having children without being married is not wrong by most religions and laws. So if it's an artificial insemination case, it's definitely not wrong (check your local law to make sure.)

However, having sex without being married IS. So if this is the case, you're already wrong there. If you choose to have an abortion (which is wrong by most religions and laws) then you'll be wrong twice.

Better be wrong once than twice, isn't it?

Answer 6

First, i imagine it almost is suitable, as long as you do accurate by way of the different human being and the toddler. for sure I stay in enormous apple, I imagine in another international places, states, or cities it continues to be heartily condemned to have a bastard. second, I did have a baby without marrying. It turned right into a tempestuous courting. I said my daughter as a lot as achieveable and presented a very straightforward volume of economic help in the direction of her prices and her mom's widespread prices. finally we were given lower back jointly and we did marry, in most cases (for me) to in consumer-friendly words make a "ideal" kinfolk for my daughter. She become 3 at our wedding ceremony, and the flower woman. yet her mom and that i shouldn't were jointly and couldn't artwork it out. we are divorced now, my daughter is 9 and doing o.k.. Her mom and that i proceed to percentage custody and duty for her, and contained in the basically accurate three hundred and sixty 5 days or so honestly get alongside o.k.. it truly is helpful. If i might want to go lower back i might want to by no ability have married her, yet then i think maximum folk who are not satisfied in a wedding ceremony might want to assert that, and those who're will disagree. desire that helps.

Answer 7

well it isn't wrong, plenty of people do it. personally to me i wanted to be married and settled down before i started having kids(i'm married but not ready for the kids yet). however there are people who cohabitate and live together for just as many years as married people and have kids. i think the best thing is that a child has 2 loving parents in their life. sure if they are happily married then great, but it isn't a requirement.

Answer 8

The most important thing is two responsible, mature adults who love each other and can care for a child. If they are prepared, as in they know what it means to raise a child, can afford it, and have educated themselves about it.

As a previous Catholic, I realized 'marriage' is really ONLY a civil union. It's recognized by law and involves your money and what you own, and your children's care and custody.

If you are married in the church only, that is not legal. That's why you sign papers in the church. (most) I'm not bashing religion, I just think one has nothing to do with the other.

I guess I'm saying ask yourself why YOU are asking. Sounds like you don't really believe in marriage, but feel guilty. Pay attention to your gut.
Do what's right for you, and know that no one can ever know for sure. We don't have crystal balls. Do your best, and good luck.
Sounds like you have a good heart.

Answer 9

NO
We had both our children before we were married. It is more important to have healthy children who are productive members of society than to worry about if they have the right birthday. I also am thankful we were able to share our wedding day with our children it made it even more special.

Answer 10

It is not wrong to have children without being married.

It is wrong for you to have a child for the wrong reasons, such as to keep your boyfriend, for financial means such as to get on welfare.
There are a lot of people that are married and have a baby to "fix" their marriages.
There are also a lot of married people who have babies that shouldn't have them.

It's a personal choice, but it's not wrong.

Answer 11

Well, being that I don't subscribe to religious dogmas, I personally don't feel it's either "wrong" or "right". To me, it's "wrong" to have children when you're not prepared to take on this responsibility. Being married doesn't automatically make you a better parent, and being unmarried does not disqualify you from being able to be fullly responsible for the child you're bringing into the world.