English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-09 14:53:16 · 16 answers · asked by Lakers 2010 Champs!!!! 4 in Politics & Government Military

16 answers

Al Qaida is more dangerous because its operations is worldwide than Hezbollah which is basically in Lebanon only.

2007-01-09 14:59:36 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

Hezbollah

2007-01-09 14:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by docketclerkguy 2 · 0 0

To us, Al-Qaeda.

To the stability of the Middle East, Hezbollah.

2007-01-09 14:58:11 · answer #3 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 0 0

Al-Qaeda.

Hezbollah just holds issues with Israel.

2007-01-09 14:58:49 · answer #4 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 0

Both very very dangerous.

Al-Qaeda is very dangerous to us directly.

But since Hezbollah is a little miny Iran(their proxy) I think having Hezbollah around is very very dangerous also.

2007-01-09 15:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by Nate 2 · 1 0

Al-Qaeda is more dangerous they opportutives could be anywhere and there could be attacks at anytime against the USA.

2007-01-09 15:02:33 · answer #6 · answered by thelongestday41 3 · 1 0

Al-Qaeda.

2007-01-13 10:03:42 · answer #7 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

Hezbollah is fighting for their freedom.
Al-Qaeda is fighting for nothing, as long as Americans get killed.
Al-qaeda is the worst. F***in terrorrist.

2007-01-09 15:04:29 · answer #8 · answered by BryanB 4 · 1 1

How unintelligent Usa can be. Idiots you set up Hezbollah. Idiots just like you unknowingly supported 9/11.

2007-01-09 15:00:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Hezb-allah, the Party of God; they are religious fundamentalists. Al Qaeda is Sunni and therefore much more secular. A-Q just wants us out. Hezb-allah wants to convert us or kill us.

2007-01-09 15:02:11 · answer #10 · answered by bullwinkle 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers