While the need to stop teh promotion of hatred/violence against woman exits, is censorship the answer?

Question

I need to come up with an argument for each side...this will be interesting. I also need to come up with an appropriate conculsion and solution.

Answer 1

Censorship is never the answer.

Answer 2

Censorship in democratic society is not workable. All women expect protection , respect and love from society. This is her right.I am not the right person to comment on sexual issues. As a mother role of a woman need no comments. Sexual harassment is common in our society. Rap and discrimination are common. I feel that there is need for change of mind which require long struggle.

Answer 3

A true democracy does not support censorship. Women have been abused in every culture and every epoch. They are under fire from Islamic Shariah as much as they were under Victorian repression. Men need to learn to stop objectifying women and grow the h up.

Answer 4

Since hatred will always exist, how would censorship change anything? It would only delete references in writing.

For example, if we forbid our students from swearing in the hallways, does that mean they don't do it outside the school?

There is no logic to this argument.

Answer 5

against- the slippery slope. ie: censor a then censoring b gets easier. Free speech ensures the democracy etc.

for- that's hard..it could probably be argued that less violent images available would resensitize the general populace to violence/expliotation ie: it has often been suggested that first person shooter video games desensitize the consequences of actually shooting and killing a human being.

Answer 6

Actually censorship would only increase the hate for women. Especially if it were well known that women caused it. See what is wrong with the way women have been treated. It is SEXISM-not SEXINESS. These are two different and almost completely exclusive things. When a women is raped, she is violated and abused because of hate and power-not because of sex, sex being meanly the mean to an end. When a woman is denied opportunities because they say she is a dumb blonde so to speak-it is because they regard her talents as irrevelant, not because she is sexy or anything. Sometimes the sexiness is used as an excuse, but it is a means towards an end , not the end in itself.
You see, why do we have sexes in the first place? It is because sex is used to reproduce the species. And nature uses sex to attract the two partners to each other for this purpose. Sex is natural and just because you are sexy doesn't mean you are brainless and visa versa. Sex is a characaristic apart and seperate from other charactaristics-as they are apart from each other. There is nothing wrong with being sexy - in fact it is an evolutionary advantage.
So the first reason against general censureship is that it seeks to deny women- a creature developed by evolution- one of her most valueble assets and one that will help ensure the continuation of her genes. The other of course is that whilst censureship will maybe in the short term discourage, it only keeps it under wraps for some future time of reaction. It never has and never will influence people's moral choices. So it is a waste of time which will not stop rapes eg. but will merely hold them over till another time. What women need and want is PROTECTION-not bandaid solutions to satisfy those who will compromise with evil and are two gutless or of lack of vision to implement that which needs to be done.
Also the supreme reason is that the decision regarding a person's morals is their concern and their concern alone. For by these deliberat, concience and knowing choices are we judged. Now if you believe in God , then only He known the heart, and therefore only he is qualified to judge the moral choice(as opposed to the ethical choices -which effect others and are not a matter of personal belief). Therefore because God is the only one who knows and is qualified-it is his province-exclusively.
You see, many years ago, there was someone who tried to usurp God's province-his name was Lucifer.
So really , what we must do , is to provided actual protection for women, seek out and punish those responsible for the women's violation and have in place a proper system of prevention. We need not to sacrifice on the altar of evil, the freedoms that our ancestors have so valiantly fought for to bequeath to us in the name of freedom. We must pay the price in recourses and effort we need to do , to do this. For when we censure stuff because of what is done to women and such, we give into the rapist in that we let him control our lives and not stop him and we take attention away from the crime to the excuse for the crime. Because beware, in every act of general censureship there is the rapist and abuser hiding in there like a trojan horse. Let us weed the son of a ***** out. For I say this to the scum- you may be trying to control your victumn's lives, but the hell you are not going , in the pit of hades, control mine.

Answer 7

No. Who's promoting hatred for women?

Answer 8

Quit watching it and it will go away or just throw someone in jail for about 20 years then maybe it would slow down.

Answer 9

censor ? upto which can we allow.
yes its there