Will Bush send more of our brave and dedicated soldiers to die in Iraq?

Question

I thought that US soldiers were suppose to give their lives for the US. Not for Bush's legacy / ego.

As an Air Force veteran and ex-member of the 2nd Bomb Wing, I don't wish to see anyone die for little to no reason. I would lay down my life to save another. I won't walk in front of a bus to slow it down.

Answer 1

I think at this point, Bush don't know WHAT to do other than send more troops! I personally am da** sick & tired of it & think he should realize that we've given enough! I wish I had known then what I know now....end of story.What can we do now? Just pray! and teach our men how to say "OOPS...my bad!!, I made a mistake! Pull out!! Pull out!!" If men were more willing to admit that they are human and DO err in judgement, we'd have been outta there a LONG time ago. Does anyone agree w/me?

Answer 2

good question. My wager, as a protection rigidity veteran, is that the extreme type of suicides the Justice branch below Rumsfeld tried to conceal may be an illustration that a number of those squaddies suspected the reality. The Marine that become interviewed in Michael Moore's movie, "Fahrenheit 9/11" rebelled and refused to wrestle "human beings in poverty" who had by no ability attacked us. The predicament is all of us comprehend the Cheney/Bush tyranny is accountable of warfare crimes, yet will the country heal or ever unite if our own Congress and Senate take steps in the direction of investigations/indictments? I keep in options the cut up that handed off after Watergate, and on account that a very youthful Hillary Clinton, as a regulation clerk, become on the Democratic committee, she become vilified years later even as she become our First woman, and later even as she ran for President by way of the novel accurate-wing who theory attempting to cheat in an election become ideal habit (the ends justified the flexibility). doesn't it truly is more effective useful for our u . s . if this unlawful warfare (and the crimes of the administration) be grew to grow to be over to a third social gathering (the UN) so our Senate, Congress, and new President can concentration on the topics of our monetary device, our international image, our tries to achieve prevalent well being care, our value-cutting in branch budgets, etc? i imagine the present appearances of Cheney are both him attempting to position a protection in case the warfare Crimes Tribunal being set up on Spain tries to summon him, otherwise he's being paid as a lobbyist to evade the proposed cuts by way of Robert Gates, in Rumsfeld's previous pastime on the Justice branch, from dealing with---fantastically those affecting his agency Halliburton (the no-bid contractor for the Pentagon in Iraq) and its subsidiary KBR, who did such shoddy artwork on the taxpayers' dime that squaddies were performed contained in the showers...or per chance both...or he's an egomaniac attempting to do a revisionist version of his political failures...

Answer 3

First of all, soldiers don't go to Iraq to die. They go there to fight for our country.

Second of all, my husband is already there and they need as much support as they can get. The increase will help.

Answer 4

If you're that worried, move to Australia and enjoy living in peace, instead of killing to feed the ego of some maniacal leader.

Answer 5

in order to make his dream comes true or any bodies else dream that controles the usa govermnet i think he will send more and more.
the problem is not bush i think it the american people they should say "no" we will not go there and die.
there are lots of ways to solve iraq problem without war.

Answer 6

I think Bush sees the troops as collateral damage or "Freedom isn't free" but you don`t hear these anymore.

Answer 7

This is just ANOTHER Bush decision which proves beyond any doubt that he is TOTALLY INCOMPETENT !!

Answer 8

They go to WIN.
You want us to lose.
WHY DOES YOUR COUNTRY WANT US TO LOSE, FOREIGN BOY?