Giving illegals any lawfull status by recognizing there existance is a slippery slope. Plus a very very costly one. We should budget 1000 dollars per illegal and make that a bounty, free market extradition and deportation, that makes more sense.
2007-01-09 08:08:15 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Clarify: Bounty paid when illegal returned and recieved at least 50 miles south of the border. Extra $100 paid for each fake ID confiscated.
2007-01-09 08:22:12 · update #1
that's what happens when an actor is voted in for office. he's not even american born. maybe americans will eventually let him run for presidency, he'll really screw america up then. an immigrant will stick up for illegals alot.
2007-01-09 08:49:23 · answer #1 · answered by monreda 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Pay the premiums and you get the state insurance plan. We are getting something for the health service. We now have addresses and a phone to identify the person. It is just a plan to get the money for the service. We get the taxes up front from them now we get the health payment up front. It is sort of like government register for guns. Some will be lost but most will be identified. Yes I do agree with your view.
2007-01-09 09:04:49 · answer #2 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong. This is people claiming above $40,000 in annual income as I understand it (since illegals claiming below that can already get subsidized insurance). Having the 'best benefit package' for illegals definitely draws them to California, and we can't afford that. Our schools and services are failing our own people.
2007-01-09 09:00:52 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I reviewed his whole plan and must say it has some merit in all areas. Except giving health insurance to illegals I think most of his plan is good. The cost for undocumented health insurance according to the proposal is approx. (in millions) 2,000. Why should our system pay this kind of money for people who do not respect our honor our laws? I wrote Arnold today on this issue and hope more of you will.
Arnold is not US born but he meets the requirements to run for Gov.( but not for presidency). All in All he has been a good Gov. even though I thought people were nuts for voting for him when Davis was tossed.
2007-01-09 08:35:35 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Wrong. The more free stuff you give illegal immigrants the more excuses they have to not try to become legal citizens.
2007-01-09 09:33:11 · answer #5 · answered by wildcatfan 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
illegals don't have health insurance unless they are commiting identity theft, what you mean to say is that he wants to set up free clinics that are made up of a combination of state and donated money(none fron Mexico, but that would be nice), it's not a bad idea, it is a good place for students to do thier internship, it gets complicated with the damn lawyers though, if illegals are allowed to prosecute for malparactice,,this could be a mistake, I still have my issues with the ACLU
2007-01-09 08:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I totally disagree with giving health insurance to illegals that the California taxpayers pay for.
2007-01-09 08:25:20 · answer #7 · answered by Sean 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I think to try and make sure all "citizens" have access to health care is admirable. However, by extending it to those who are here illegally is a slap in the face to all those who are abiding by the law (and paying for it).
2007-01-09 08:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by straightup 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I think Arnold needs to be recalled from office. I guess we shouldn't be surprised, he is married to a Kennedy. God knows they will do anything for a vote!
2007-01-09 09:33:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it's a great idea, as long as he sells his house and his fleet of Hummers to do that, and forfeits his pay to help defray the costs...problem is, a lot of politicians tend to be more generous with YOUR money, and they have fun all day with their social engineering games. It'd be whole bunches better if they took that same money and invested it in Mexico, I think. Fix the problem at the source, so to speak. But, that'd make sense, and it'd probably work, and so we likely won't be seeing it....
2007-01-09 08:21:08 · answer #10 · answered by gokart121 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I like the idea of a bounty on their heads, now only if the government was willing to do anything but re-release them....
2007-01-09 08:17:04 · answer #11 · answered by bmw4909 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋