No true Scotsman is a term coined by Antony Flew in his 1975 book Thinking About Thinking. It refers to an argument which takes this form:
Argument: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
Reply: "But my uncle Angus likes sugar with his porridge."
Rebuttal: "Ah yes, but no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
This form of argument is a fallacy if the predicate ("putting sugar on porridge") is not actually contradictory for the accepted definition of the subject ("Scotsman"), or if the definition of the subject is silently adjusted after the fact to make the rebuttal work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
I would like to devote this to all the "nice" Christians who insist that I never "truly" accepted Jesus in my 20-odd years of being a Christian, having a personal relationship with God, attending church three times a week, going to Bible camp every summer, going to Christian schools and college, being a Bible Quizzer, and praying every day.
2007-01-09
06:24:12
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070109110244AABNcqk&r=w
And a big thank you to Radagast for putting a name to the fallacy. :)
2007-01-09
06:24:43 ·
update #1
I know I'm on the right track when Godless and Zero Cool approve. :)
2007-01-09
06:32:24 ·
update #2