If you disagree with the war.
How would you feel about the war in Iraq if there is wasn't as many american casualties?
2007-01-09 05:13:20 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I was against the war in Iraq from the start. I didn't believe Bush when he said that Al Quaida had ties to Saddam, because Osama and Saddam HATED each other.
I didn't believe that there were WMDs because Scott Ritter, UN Inspector, said that Iraq was neutered.
I didn't think we should start another war when we weren't done with Afghanistan yet...still aren't. And now we are going at it in Somalia AGAIN!!!
2007-01-09 05:18:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋
Karmic Debt?? PLEASE!! We entered WWII for the same reasons a Iraq, Freedom!! Freedom for all people, everywhere!! The Lord created us to be free, not under tyranny!! My Fathers were in WWI and WWII, Korea, Vietnam as was I, I didn't stop then and I won't now or ever! Does this then mean that I like war?? Absolutely not!! But what do you do when a dog goes mad?? You put him down for the safety of all. I would much prefer fighting this war over there, than here!! Any Day!! Have some back-bone!!
Most of all, read your Bible about Jacob and Esua, then and only then will you finally understand what is going on over there and what it should mean to us here. May the Lord Bless all of us, more than any.....our Brothers and Sisters in Uniform!!
2007-01-09 13:30:56 · answer #2 · answered by dontwobears@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would still be against it. We went after the wrong person. We should have went after Bin Laden not Saddam. Iraq had nothing to do with attacking us on 9/11. The only thing it did successfully was take the focus off of Bin Laden and put in Iraq and Saddam.
2007-01-09 13:24:19 · answer #3 · answered by j 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
War in Iraq was never part of American national interests but it was for the interests of few lobbies in Washington like the Israeli lobby.
2007-01-09 13:52:23 · answer #4 · answered by DAVAY 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A war can't be judged on the number of casualties. We are there because we were attacked by radical Muslim terrorists. They are based in Iraq. They get money and support from Iraq.
Our only alternatives to this war are letting them attack here again or simply rolling over and letting them run our country completely.
I prefer that we take the war to them.
.
2007-01-09 13:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The Iraq invasion was wrong before the first American casualty.
2007-01-09 13:18:36 · answer #6 · answered by donkeehotay999 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The number of casualties is irrelevant. We had no reason to go there to start with. If no Americans died, it still doesn't make it right.
2007-01-09 13:21:46 · answer #7 · answered by capu 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The same as I do know....Kicking butt! 3,000 casualties is not bad for almost 4 years of war. Put it in perspective, on Iwo Jima we (I'm an old Marine) lost 7,000 Marines in 30 days! Being a quick fix society now days most people in Amercia can't grasp that!
2007-01-09 13:18:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The US congress should have stopped Bush before he ever sent one person into Iraq. Now millions of people are dieing or going to die for being in Iraq and Afghanistan. If you wonder why please go read the web sites below.
2007-01-09 13:24:56 · answer #9 · answered by pinelake302 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For a war of this duration, the casualties are VERY VERY low.
2007-01-09 13:35:02 · answer #10 · answered by mmd 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't give a crap about american casualties - I give a crap about ALL the casualties.
We destroyed the country. We have completely annhilated Iraq and killed tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of citizens, or caused them to be killed by our actions. That's a heck of a karmic debt.
FP
2007-01-09 13:18:50 · answer #11 · answered by F. Perdurabo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋