Wikipedia!!!?

Question

i wud like 2 report wikipedia's contents...how do u do dat?? actually i was reading this article on Asphyxiation n it gave examples of killing dogs by suffocating them, so i wud like to report this web page by wikipedia to whoevr it wud concern, like the animal rights or people for animals or some organization like that.
infact, i wud appreciate it if u look in2 d page urself n take some actions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asphyxiation
its in the 8th line of 1st paragraph [citation needed]
thanx

Answer 1

Unfortunately whether it's listed on Wikipedia or not, people are smart enough to know that you can kill a dog by suffocating them, it's a legit article. You can go onto a Animal Rights site and they explain how animals died in certain cases, people get ideas from that.

Your concern is wonderful, but don't go all PETA on them and start blowing the article out of proportion. Maybe stating that this is how you can kill a dog is very inappropriate, but either way it is common sense to any one with half a brain that if you suffocate a breathing being it's going to die.

Here is a link to report the article to Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem
Use the one where it says There's nonsense in an article (e.g. irrelevant or shocking remarks or pictures) or it's blank it is the 3rd one down.

When you right your letter be sure to properly spell, punctuate, etc. Don't go writing lyk3 dis bcuz dat iz not kewl and no one will take you serious, plus it's irritating as **** makes you sound like a moron and they will probably stop reading it after a few sentences. Write like a human being.

Good luck, I'll write to them as well.

Answer 2

Wikipedia would not be actual appropriate. specific, it has some faults. whether, for common suggestion, i think of this is exceptionally ineffective on, pondering lots of the advice comes from stable and actual information sources. you will discover the references maximum situations, simply by fact the links are presented. For regardless of reason, i've got constantly felt that Wiki gets a super form of abuse it does not deserve. this is an fairly clever gadget that usually facilitates me employer up information or ascertain i'm getting the spelling of names authentic. at the same time as the advice can get replaced with the aid of everybody, i've got yet to work out absolute bogus suggestion final for terribly long. as a result, i think this is a relatively stable source.

Answer 3

Click the "edit" tab at the top of the page, fix the content, and then add an edit summary in the box at the bottom explaining what you're doing and click the "save" button.

Wikipedia is openly editable, so you can fix this problem by yourself. Your edit will be shown immediately, so it's much quicker than trying to contact another volunteer editor and hoping they will have time to edit the article.

Answer 4

Use this link to report it:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Vandalism

I can't believe that they would discuss something like that where people have open access to it. Yes, it's an experiment, but I don't think that animal-torturing sickos out there need any more ideas!

And, like everyone else is saying, report in plain English so people can understand you better.

Answer 5

You could always navigate to the wikipedia's contact section. I doubt there will be any action taken, since the article is objective (and not persuasive, telling you to go kill a dog).

Answer 6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us

Answer 7

You need to refer this question over to the yahoo answers computer people. They know all about this stuff.

Answer 8

football