for example the world was created in six days... the world is the center of the universe. Please back up you answers by stating which clause of the bible you are referring to. Thanks :-)
2007-01-08 20:19:00 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Noah's Ark - there isn't enough water in the atmosphere, or underground, to flood the Earth. A metereorite would have burnt Noah's ****. Impossible to catch all the creatures and keep them alive on the Ark.
Adam and Eve did not exist - our ancestors emerged from Africa, and not the Middle East.
I couldn't be bothered backing up with clauses though. Do a simple Google search and you'll find heaps of evidence to back up evolution. Too much work to answer your question.
2007-01-08 20:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There are none, contrary to popular belief. The two scriptures you mention Circle of the Earth and its rotation is found in Isiaah 40:12. You are writing with literal light Job 38:19,35 at about 186,000 miles per second. the one day is a literal 1000 years in 2nd Peter 3. No scripture claims the earth is the center of the universe! Hebrews 1:1-2 there is a universe, denoted by the plural worlds!
The probabilities about the Messiah are an exponential number almost impossible for the human mind to concieve! Global warming and the earth getting old are not new concepts and were written in the Bible more that 300 years before Aristotle. Isaiah 51:6, Hebrews 1:11. Genesis 1:11 all creating is finished! Dinosaurs and man walked together on earth, called behemoth and leviathan Job 40.
2007-01-08 21:36:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Bible says the earth was created at the beginning (Gen 1:1) not in 6 days. The 6 days actually refered to the restoration of the earth after it became without form and void (Gen 1:2 onwards). The Bible makes no claim that the earth is the center of the universe. It is man's belief that the earth is so. The Bible is not intended to be a scientific treatise but it tells mainly of God's dealing with the Adamic race.
2007-01-08 20:44:36 · answer #3 · answered by seekfind 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty interested in actually seeing these, but don't see anything so far. Heavens(Universe--greek interchangable words) and Earth was created in six days which throws yours out. The greeks also used the same symbol(word) for love and God. The Bible is more for teaching, and not quite so literal. No one knows the absolute truth, and you can't mix science with religion. They each have their own place. Science does not prove how many days the Earth was created either, and even if there was a big bang or whatever, how can you possibly prove that God didn't create the Big Bang? Again, science and religion have their own places, and there is never going to be an absolute answer from either side.
2007-01-08 20:36:12 · answer #4 · answered by Nep 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
(m)
Not really. However, there are sometimes different interpretations of the Bible. For example, most English translations of the book of Genesis speak of 7 days of creation. However, the original Hebrew word that is translated into "day" actually means a period of time, not necessarily 24 hours.
Some people think that the Bible gets the mathematical number pi wrong. pi = 3.1415926... and is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. I Kings 7:23 describes a "Sea" (or huge bowl) of cast metal that is circular in shape. It measures 10 cubits "from rim to rim" and 30 cubits around it. That implies that pi = 3. Is the Bible wrong about pi? No. Reading further, we learn in I Kings 7:26 that the Sea is a "handbreadth in thickness." So Bible probably means that the outer diameter is 10 cubits and the inner circumference is 30 cubits. Doing some math, we find that this would mean that the difference between the inner and outer diameters, i.e., the thickness of the Sea, is about 0.2 cubits. A cubit is about 18 inches, so 0.2 cubits is 4 inches which is a handbreadth.
2007-01-08 20:26:57 · answer #5 · answered by mallimalar_2000 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
they did not know much science, but the idea that the earth was flat might be one. The lighting of the moon before the sun in genesis might be another.
The bible has bigger problems than getting science wrong.
Take a look at this site: http://www.bibleorigins.net/
2007-01-08 20:26:30 · answer #6 · answered by Barabas 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there are no scientific inaccuacies in the Bible.
While there may be a few translation issues in the Bible the original text is completely accurate. However, the scientific community is not quite as accurate. There have been lawsuits in the news lately of this and such drugs causing this and such complications for a certain number of people.
If doctors are scientist and they prescribed these drugs then science must be a practice instead of a fact.
2007-01-08 20:33:56 · answer #7 · answered by sodajerk50 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
well thats not a scientific innacuracy.
there are not scientific innacuracies i nthe bible because there is nothing scientific in the bible.
the world being created in 6 days is a fable, not science.
then again if you asked what stuff is in the bible that science has proven otherwise...well....a bunch of stuff
2007-01-08 20:22:09 · answer #8 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
I think you should watch the following debate and click on Quran & Bible in the light of science:
http://www.aswatalislam.net/DisplayFilesP.aspx?TitleID=50027
2007-01-08 23:16:51 · answer #9 · answered by By Any Means Necessary 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
noah's ark is a perfect example.
the ark would have needed to be as big as the Titanic.
then, you'd need two more Titanics for their fresh food and water for all that time "at sea".
total nonsense. an impossible story.
you'll find hundreds of errors and self-contradictions in that ridiculous book.
2007-01-08 20:23:37 · answer #10 · answered by Jeebus is my Rectum 1 · 5⤊ 0⤋