MUSLIMS: is this story true about Prophet Muhammed?

Question

One day Apostle of Allah walked into his adopted son Zaid’s house. Zaid was not there but he caught a glimpse of his voluptuous and beautiful wife Zainab (she was apostle’s first cousin) in her birthday suit.

Tabari wrote:

"One day Muhammad went out looking for Zaid. Now there was a covering of hair cloth over the doorway, but the wind had lifted the covering so that the doorway was uncovered. Zaynab was in her chamber, undressed, and admiration for her entered the heart of the Prophet".

The admiration aroused him instantly, which Zainab also noticed and mentioned it to her husband Zaid later. He rushed to his father’s house and offered Zainab to him. Mohammed worried about possible bad press and refused to accept it. But Allah will not take no for an answer and insisted on their union.

Q 33:37 We gave her (Zaid’s wife) unto thee in marriage, so that (henceforth) there may be no sin for believers in respect of wives of their adopted sons”.

Answer 1

Yeah, allah insisted on their union!! That is hilarious. If that isn't a man's religion, I don't know what is. Eerily similar to mormonism...

Answer 2

Mari Flor,

The fact is Muhammad DID take zainab from his own adopted son. That cannot be a lie because the biographies of Muhammad prove this. The reason why you have been asked to look at the Q’uran instead has its purpose in distracting you from the issue at hand.

In the past, the Q’uran couldn’t stand on itself and nobody knew what it was talking about as it incoherent. What came along was the Bukhar & Tabari which lent the backdrops to the instructions written in the Q’uran. The ONLY AND MOST AUTHORITATIVE Islamic history available today is THE BUKHARI & TABARI.

Nowadays however, the Bukhar & Tabari has lost its place amongst the modernist islamist because islam has already been established. These scenario books are no longer relevant.

That’s why there are people here telling you to just read the Q’uran.

The religion is like a snake. Once the supporting entity has served its purpose, it is dumped. Just like the bible. The muslims use the bible to support their claims even though they say it is corrupted. Its like calling some faeces and stuffing it into their mouths. Then again, once the bible speaks against them (eg. Denying anymore prophets after John the Baptist etc), the muslims quickly turn around and tell you to leave the bible alone.

I know its confusing. Its confusing everybody. But that’s what is keeping islam alive.

Yes, Muhammad took zainab. Which is INCEST. But what is more intriguing is, allah allowed the adopted son to first marry zainab before asking her to be divorced. Either allah has no foresight or allah is a piece of filth that delights in re-marriages. Muhammad conjured up allah to support his shames.

Answer 3

this hadith you mention has to be authenticated, and this hadith is contrary to the prophets behavior. But the verse of the quran you quote tells you why the prophet married her, not out of admiration, but as a lesson for the followers that marriage to orphans that they raise is okay, that these orphans are not the same as sons. Also why didn't you mention the fact that both zaid and zaynab did not want to stay married to each other, before her marriage to the prophet? That is very important, b/c if you don't mention that, you make it seem that the prophet had a desire for her, so zaid was forced to divorce her, or was that your objective all along? please stop from lying and distorting information.

Answer 4

I'm so with Benjamin, Hadiths were actually written 200 years after prophet Muhammad's death. I follow the Quran, which has been unchanged. No its not true, Zaid divorced her for a separate reason and Prophet Muhammad later married her. It is against Islam to look or take anyone's wife, it is untrue. Study about Muhammad gentle and shy but assertive character. that is not only against teh Quran, but totally out of his character.

Answer 5

it isn't a genie he cought in spite of the undeniable fact that it become devil! and he let him go. and right it truly is the hadith narated by way of Abu huraira that would nicely be a non sahih hadith and on account that you've searched or chanced in this tale right here why no longer seem into different significant issues that could be counted more effective than tying devil to a pillar. yet regardless, right here it really is... Muhammad choked devil The Prophet once provided the prayer and stated, "devil got here in the front of me and tried to break my prayer, yet Allah gave me an top hand on him and that i choked him. little doubt, i considered tying him to between the pillars of the mosque till you upward push up contained in the morning and be conscious him. Then I remembered the reality of Prophet Solomon, 'My Lord ! Bestow on me a kingdom alongside with shall no longer belong to the different after me.' Then Allah made him (devil) go back consisting of his head down (humiliated)." volume 2, e book 22, form 301, Narrated Abu Huraira

Answer 6

I don't read or follow the Hadith, Bukhari, Tabari, or any of those other MAN MADE scripts. They're useless and un-reliable and most of them were written 100s of years AFTER Mohammad's death by men who had little to do with him. If you want to know about Islam, read the Qur'an NOT that Hadith or that Bukhari non-sense.

There is no legit proof of that being true so my answer is no, it's not true.

Answer 7

its just a hadith..... It doesn't make Prophet Muhammad a bad person, after all he was human & a Prophet of Allah.

Answer 8

It won't even enter your brain when the sword of the savage believer crosses your throat and your head rolls across the floor.
peace out

Answer 9

Good Question, I should know that but i dont.. haha JohnC cracked me up.

Answer 10

Nobody knows....noone was alive then...just like Christ. Lets get real....let's all live together.