Veritas459a you're a half-wit.
Using the decision to reclassify a planet as your argument against science, just shows how ignorant you are.
You may as well try to use our increased knowledge of quantum mechanics and sub-atomic particle physics to claim that Newtonian mechanics is flawed and that he (Sir Isaac) was an idiot who just made it all up and guessed everything.
Every path along the road to scientific progess has been resisted by crackpots like you who should be locked away for the benefit of mankind.
2007-01-11 01:05:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by David M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You speak about Education? HOW MUCH COLLEGE POST GRADUATE CREDITS DO YOU HAVE?
And yet you make comments about Science which is Continually Changing!
January Last year there were 7-Planets, but in the Summer SCIENCE changed the number to 6, and declassified a planet as A Ball of ICE!
You were convinced that there were 7 but latter when Science Changed their Mind, YOU agreed with SCIENCE and choose 6?
Which Science do you want Me to use to Convince YOU? The Old Science or the New Science?
Oh yes, DO I MENTION THE "FLAT EARTH THEORY?"
As a Christian, I never try to persuade ANYONE THAT IS NOT OPEN TO = PLAIN AND SIMPLE = LOGIC!
YOU don't really want to Know about GOD and His WORD, = you just want To Mock GOD!
Thanks, RR
2007-01-08 21:13:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
well because many believe that the bible is a book to be interpreted and Moses writing the order of the creation with no scientific knolage could simply of been writing down what he saw, makeing Genisis.
The bible is a book of stories that the Holy Spirit has inspired people to write by showing them thing making them dream or even giving them feelings.
So think if you were Mose and you saw the birth of the Earth all in a rush you would write it down, but details get lost. Just ask the police, witnesses can't be relied on.
And so it is not science proving the bible wronge o the other way around it may just be Moses got the two mixed up.
2007-01-08 21:00:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dan Ln 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
I believe that the information contained in Genesis is opened to many different ways of interpretations.
I do believe that it says that life began in the oceans before land animals came forth.
I believe in a source (God) however; I do believe evolution has a role in it as well.
2007-01-08 20:51:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tim 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you sure you have your facts right ?
Verse 24 comes after verse 20 and not before. Check it out again and come back.
P. S. You don't need to be educated or a Christian to see that.
2007-01-08 21:15:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you sure about that? Because the last time I checked the fossils weren't a very reliable record since there are about 4 different ways of doing so. plus if one of the ways doesn't match the "assumed" age of the fossils, they keep changing the method until it does.
2007-01-08 20:51:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by thstuff9946 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Where did you get the idea that land animals preceded water animals? I just read (again) the text,and do not get that idea.
2007-01-08 21:14:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by jefferyspringer57@sbcglobal.net 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
www.answersingenesis.org
2007-01-10 10:07:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by trebor88 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are putting the cart before the horse. If you would step out in Faith and trust that GOD will show you these things once you place your trust in HIM, then you might get somewhere. Otherwise, nothing anyone says on this forum will convince you. It comes down to TRUSTING the CREATOR first, and letting HIM reveal His wisdom to you AFTERWARDS.
2007-01-08 20:50:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by lookn2cjc 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Do your own research on early whales....they were actually land animals living near the water. Gradually they became water animals -- its also the reason they are mammals and not fish!
2007-01-08 21:06:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Carmelite 6
·
1⤊
2⤋