how short is too short, in skiing?

Question

my boyfriend is 6'2 and we have some 150 skiis, which come to his adam's apple. we are going to montana and are these skiis too short to have a good time in the powder?

Answer 1

It depends 100% on what you're skiing. For strictly powder, you'd want powder skis (fatter width) with less of a sidecut (no carving). Length depends on skill with a ski like a powder ski - 170 - 190 would be my guess.

If you just have skis lying around, odds are they aren't what you want. If they're older (not shaped skis), 150 is WAY too short. But for a newer slalom race ski, that length would be fine for him.

For comparison, I'm 6', 225 lbs, and have 171 slalom, 198 GS, and 209 SuperG skis, all shaped.

Also, a 150 cm ski won't come up to his adam's apple, so you might want to check that length again.

Answer 2

True on hard pack the ski might work but a 150 is Very short for a powder ski for a guy 6'2". Start looking in the 175 to 180 range. The ski will float better, be more stable at the higher speeds and track better on the crud. Chances are he will sink like a stone on the 150s. Good luck and have fun.

Answer 3

Ski length is determined by way of a pair diverse aspects, the first of which being your weight (a ski doesn't comprehend how tall you're). second is your ability. more effective useful skiers pick longer skis as they are going to oftentimes be going speedier and longer skis are more effective sturdy. Shorter skis are a lot less puzzling to reveal, it really is why they're favourite by way of novices. The third ingredient is what style of terrain you'll ski on quite oftentimes. For groomed and not hassle-free packed circumstances it truly is basically no longer a ingredient yet in case you'll ski in quite oftentimes delicate snow and powder you pick to get extremely longer ski because it would want to have more effective floor section (the more effective floor section a ski has the a lot less it sinks contained in the delicate snow). The very last ingredient you pick to consider is what style of ski you're paying for. particular kinds of skis are certainly designed to be skied longer or shorter than others. Taking a majority of those aspects into interest i might want to point round a 145cm length for you. 145cm is your "base" length in accordance on your weight. Being an intermediate you're making 0 length adjustment for. As an intermediate i am going to anticipate you spend maximum of your time on groomed trails, lower back you're making no longer adjustment for. and ultimately you'll pick a more effective carving/all-mountain style ski that can help you you strengthen your technique which lower back you're making no length adjustment for. The 145cm is a handbook, no longer a rule as no longer each manufacture makes a 145cm length. as an example in a K2 you are able to be a 146, a one hundred forty four in an Atomic, a 146 in a Rossignol, etc. some options for a pair fashions to envision out might want to be: the Atomic Cloud 8 (very wide performance variety), the K2 real Luv (very forgiving), or the Rossignol Attraxion a million (large area grip). a majority of those skis will be a brilliant step up from leases and grant you with a ton more effective self belief to take your snowboarding to the subsequent factor.

Answer 4

I would say that those skies are a bit to short for him. Skis these days should come between your lips and tip of your nose. But the real key to powder is the width of the ski. Fatter is better in that case. But i would recommend around a 170 give of take 5 cm. for some one of that height. If he is a "good skier" he should be able to handle more ski.

Answer 5

I lived in Montana for 6 years. Surface area (wider and longer skis) are better for powder. But, you don't want to sacrifice the overall performance of a pair of skis by getting longer, wider ones unless you will be skiing only powder. For the best experience I would suggest a mid-fat ski inthe 177-188cm range, depending on his ability.

Answer 6

yes they r to short becuz in powder he'd have lean back really far and after one run he couldnt do another (if he makes it down without passing out).
i wear 150cm skis and im 5'2" and thay r a little short 4 me and i hit 6 inches of powder and leaned back and still almost flipped so he would flip for sure.
he needs atleast 164cm to 180cm

Answer 7

No, one of my all time best days skiing was on short skis.

They are more maneuverable. Easy to cut with. And he may never want to go back to longer ones.

Longer is not better.. .ha ha..

Answer 8

I guess this is too short even if these skis are extra wide, you need some length any way at least body length

Answer 9

wow what makes you think youll have powder...good luck