Why do rich people adopt foreign babies?

Question

There are so many orphaned kids that need homes here? I know a filthy rich lady who flew all the way to China to adopt a baby girl, while the orphaned kids here get left out in the cold.
Doesn't make any sense.

Answer 1

I think it's because custody laws are weird in the US- even if you adopt a child, and the parents sign legally to give it to you, they can decide later that they want the kid back, and win it back in court. Our legal system often favors natural parents over adoptive parents, regardless of the actual welfare of the child involved. You don't get that complication as much with foreign adoptions.
It is very sad, though that it works that way...though I am sure birth parents taking their children back is relatively rare, it's a risk a lot of adoptive parents probably don't want to take.

Answer 2

make perfect sense to me,
If I were rich and wanted good publicity, to keep my name in the news what could I do, go to a third world country and save some poor starving child with no hope of a deacent life and education?
Well of coarse if I adopt a child from here, they wouldn't be starving ( we have a welfare system ), and they wouldn't be denied an education ( we have school systems ) and the United States is the richest nation in the world, so that wouldn't make national headlines, so we better go get a third world countrys child to save.Thats better news coverage.
Do you really think that stars like Angelina, Brad, and even Madonna actually take complete care of these children? They are being cared for by the same people who are taking care of there children when they are on location filming, or out on the publisity junkit, or those red carpet parties, there nannies.
I don't remember seeing to many kids at the oscars, or emmys,
and milk and cookies are not as glamorus as champaign and caviar.
ITS all Publisity and keeping ones name in the news
If they really wanted to do something to help these children then why not leave them with there own people, and sponcer a family there? Or maybe support an orphanege or school there where you could help more than 1 child, but with there money and resorces they could help many

Answer 3

properly, non-rich human beings undertake foreign places infants, too-you in simple terms do not hear approximately it as many times. i think of the justifications human beings undertake foreign places infants is that all and sundry is worrying that, contained while it comes to kinfolk adoptions, the beginning mom will substitute her strategies and elect the toddler back (as has occurred in some intense-profile situations in recent times-regardless of the incontrovertible fact that kinfolk adoption officers say this is amazingly uncommon). each so often, the beginning father shows up and needs the toddler back (back, i think of those situations are uncommon, yet they get the exposure). Adopting is amazingly high priced after all, relatively in a foreign country, that's why rich human beings can handle to pay for it. nevertheless, this is high priced to have a organic and organic baby, too. As for celebrities adopting foreign places infants, i think of this is been romanticized with the aid of the media-the stars "save" those infants with the aid of giving them an entire life of luxury. perhaps their intentions are better than that, however the media memories concentration on the "rags-to-riches" element.

Answer 4

I think this is because people feel that they are less likely to get into a huge legal battle if the biological parents decide that they want to have the child after all. In the USA, when that happens, the child usually goes to the biological parent even if that person has a bad track record.

Answer 5

I agree with you 100% I believe that charity starts at home.