Were there more American soldiers in Europe or the Pacific in World War II?

Question

Where did we deploy more soldiers - to Europe or to Asia and the Pacific? What were the troop numbers on each front? And what were the casualty numbers in each theater?

Answer 1

Europe, because you had to main combat theatres. Northern Europe ( Normandy, Belgium, Germany) and the Italian Campaign. Most of the Pacific was fought by the US Marines, with the exception of the China Burma India theatre and those Army units that augmented the Marine Corps Landing forces or the Army units that Invaded the Phillipines.

Answer 2

I comprehend your frustration with an excellent variety of people being unaware of the sacrifices of the British and Soviets to take care of a eu victory. The conflict might have not been gained with out those eu armies yet diminishing the american function in victory because of the fact which you're annoyed at some American ignoramuses is purely as undesirable in a opposite form of way. extremely that the eastern allied with the Germans interior the conflict for the main purpose of keeping the U. S. out of Europe mutually as the Soviets concentrated on Europe commencing Asian and Pacific domination by technique of the eastern. Hitler needed the people out of Europe because of the fact the Allied grant lines may be purely approximately countless with American components and money. Japan became better than accommodating German attitude because of the fact the dominance of the Pacific actual allowed them to regulate an entire hemisphere. the secret's that the Britains, the Soviets and the people all had a extensive function in securing the protection of Europe. The British and American footholds in North Africa allowed a launching pad to invade Italy and knock out a Axis potential. It additionally killed a extensive Axis grant line for gas. whilst this became carried out the Germans became actual surrounded and became battling a three front conflict.... and then D-day established a Northern front. to ignore the fee of a American presence in D-Day and the conflict of Bulge may be rewriting historic previous. I comprehend your frustration with American idiots that declare every person may be speaking German with out usa.... i be attentive to that's idiotic and is purely flat incorrect yet discounting the american components and manpower and air potential and tank forces extraordinarily is purely bitter grapes. Hitler might have imploded finally because of the fact the German defense force have been unfold out too skinny yet with out each and each little bit of the Alliance he might have easily survived a decade long conflict or his regime might have negotiated a treaty that would have nevertheless tolerated a prolonged Germany.

Answer 3

In the Pacific there wasnt vary many Americans. just the Marines. and they werent really supported that well because the Americans wanted to put all the effort into Europe. so most of the fighting forces were in Europe trying to defeat the germans

Answer 4

There weren't very many American soldiers in the Pacific at all, because the Pacific campaigns were fought mainly by the Marine Corps.

Answer 5

yes, the other people were right, more americans went to support the European effort.

to note, the Americans did not help Great Britain , we paid for it, the last payment was made last month, £160 million last month - a tiny amount for a western power. We spend that a day in health care now, But 60 years ago , it was a huge amount. Bearing in mind that US stole an empire and ruined it within 50 years.