At his best, virtually unbeatable, I think only Ali would have had a chance. Wasted it all though, didn't he?
2007-01-08 09:57:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ahwell 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
number 1. personally, i think ali was a bit overrated. alis probably top 10 or maybe even top 5, but if he handt of beaten foreman, he wouldnt be remembered as "the greatest" and all of alis trash talk and arrogance and i am the greatest of all time probably contributed to that. it is true that ali did face probably better competition than tyson, and ill give him that. on the other hand, tyson was a force of nature. he had unrivaled power and speed. his punches had so much speed and precision that theres no way you could see it coming and any of his punches could have knocked you on the canvas. some people say that he never faced any decent competition, but i believe he did, but just made them look awful, and he faced all of the champions. he was also the youngest to win the heavyweight championship, which should account for something. and the buster douglas fight was a fluke, if you go back and watch it, tyson at one point earlier in the fight had knocked down buster douglas, but the ref was busy with tyson, and buster douglas was on the canvas for more than 10, but the red started late. hence, with his unrivaled speed power and precision i think tyson was probably number 1.
2007-01-09 13:57:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by redsoxbigpapi34 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
he's relatively interior the ideal 10 heavyweights. no person in heavyweight historic past replaced into as feared or as dominant as he replaced into throughout his maximum suitable 6-7 years. additionally, he merits a super form of credit for regaining 2 (2) titles after being in detention center for 3 years. He had 11 call defenses in under 6 years, that's fairly outstanding. And to function to that, Tyson replaced into 37-0 with 40 3 knockout, 19 interior the 1st around, formerly dropping his first combat to Bust Douglas. that's untouchable.
2016-10-30 09:08:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by alyson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ali, Louis, Dempsey, J. Johnson, Marciano, Langford, Foreman, Tunney, Charles, Liston, Frazier, Holmes, Holyfield, Walcott, Lewis, Tyson...........#16
2007-01-08 18:00:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by gman 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Its a matter of perspective--He was the best of all time--No doubt he lost his credibility by ruining his rep and motivation to be the best--life and media destroyed him--it was obvious to any Tyson fan he was going downhill---career wise its a no-brainer Ali had the most courageous career--avenging 3 defeats---I can only say those years Tyson was on top proved to the boxing world that at that time he was the most dangerous boxer of all time--tons of boxers had better records and careers---but if you take the all the greatest heavyweights in their prime and compare---Tyson would have crushed them all--I'd give Ali three rounds--so no way is it smart to say Tyson was the greatest--but judging by his dominance and force he had when his head was screwed on right, nobody could have stopped him--NOBODY but himself--and thats what he did after firing Kevin Rooney--destroy the greatest heavyweight to ever live--
2007-01-08 16:56:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jay Real 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
so much of the heavyweight title is all about show business. it counts. the history goes way back. tyson was a knockout artist. if he could get in the right position he could drop anybody in one punch. i find he is the most interesting to watch in reruns than any other heavyweight. ali was big old clown toward the end. just managed to keep standing while they scrambled his brains. his is a sad thing. he was once so bright and witty. traded brains for dollars. ali had a weak punch as he aged and looked fatter. lost the footwork he just could take a punch as good as anybody. tyson was a bipolar mess but he had an instinctive technique to come up from the floor with a stroke that dropped the biggest men. nobody did it nearly as good. yep, rather watch his reruns more than all the rest. he should have bought all the rights to the reruns. they are run over and over and somebody besides me watch them. in his short career, at his peak his opponents showed their fear as he stalked them. he was awesome. he just kinda lost his damn mind. too bad.
2007-01-08 12:00:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Tyson is #1! Iron Mike (as he was known) would still knock most of today's fighters out for the count
2007-01-11 08:33:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by sportsfan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mike Tyson in his prime would imo be the 4th best heavyweight of all time. Ali, a prime Holmes and Joe Frazier would have beaten him.
2007-01-08 12:14:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by evs 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
For me mike Tyson has been one of the best boxing performer i ever seen,having said that you only got to watch 45 seconds of some of his fight.the guys a animal,fighting animal.
in his prime he was unbeatable such a shame he went the way he did.
can you imagine Tyson's power with Ali speed and grace,scary...!
2007-01-09 02:19:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a matter of opinion and hard to say as most of the best heavies where not around at the same time as mike-ali foreman frazier-holyfield was but they where both past it when they fought.anywhere in that list from top to bottom?
2007-01-12 04:13:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Paul C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the first few years of his career in the top 5.After Buster Douglas beat him maybe in the top 20.I think he could still be a good one but as he has gotten older he lost his desire and is just looking for a check.I would compare it to a band who had one hit 20 years ago and were still riding the fame of a one hit wonder.
2007-01-08 11:18:57
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jim C 6
·
0⤊
1⤋