What percentage of truth does George W Bush tell?

Question

For example, if you think he is 10% truthful, then your answer would be 10%. If you think he is completely truthful as a President, then 50% would be the answer for the best President we've ever had. :)

Answer 1

-10% He lies so much sometimes he might tell a truth but only because he thought it was a lie when he siad it.

Answer 2

Well, I think he is truthful and deceptive in everything he says. He tells the truth when he says that if we didn't go to war war would come to us eventually. I think he's full of crap when he says just about everything else regarding this war. The reason for it being WMD's was a lie, how long we would be there was a lie, the end of major combat missions was a lie and that Iraqis want democracy was a lie. Iraqi people have been brainwashed and abused for too many years to govern themselves. The minute one evil dictator type gets taken down another one steps up and everyone jumps to follow. That is how it will be for many years to come. I guess that makes my answer 39.8 percent

Answer 3

G W Bush is type of an excellent type of politicians he's a third or fourth era one. He doesn't understand the mendacity isn't portion of his on a daily basis life. He doesn't even comprehend or care that mendacity is incorrect. He has been in contact with deceit all his life and the electorate were fooled two times by way of his lies. Now the mess will be not hassle-free to freshen up, in spite of the undeniable fact that it really is a actual mess and would could be dealt with. perchance time period limits isn't the reply perchance we could continuously by no ability pick a politicians son or grandson

Answer 4

It's funny but I can't give him a percent at all. This man has broken all ethics in being the President as far as I'm concerned. He has lied to us from the start. Lied about the nuclear weapons just so we would feel "not guilty" about sending our troops to Iraq I can't give him credit for catching Sadaam since it was not him technically but our armed forces that caught up with his butt.Now he wants to deploy more troops to Iraq and spend billions more on a no win situation and someone elses Civil War. No..I cannot give this man a percentage so no to me he was not the best President for our nation.And yes I'm a democrat BUT I do give credit where credit is do but I just can't give this man any credit when he hasn't earned any. Sorry

Answer 5

Here is the proof that he is a liar and if you too stupid to believe facts than god help you (referring to all who read this, not the Q asker)
The "Downing Street memo" (occasionally DSM, or the "Downing Street Minutes"), sometimes described by critics of the Iraq War as the "smoking gun memo", contains an overview of a secret 23 July 2002 meeting among United Kingdom Labour government, defence and intelligence figures, discussing the build-up to the war—including direct reference to classified United States policy of the time. It clearly states that, "Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
Introduction

The memo was first published in The Sunday Times on May 1 2005, during the last days of the UK's general election campaign.

The Memo went largely unremarked in the US press at first but was heavily covered in progressive blogs such as those on Daily Kos, in particular because of a remark attributed to Richard Dearlove (then head of British foreign intelligence service MI6) that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed [by the US] around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power, which was taken to show that US intelligence on Iraq prior to the war was deliberately falsified, rather than simply mistaken. (Dearlove was reporting on his meeting with US security chiefs.) As this issue began to be covered by American media, two other main allegations stemming from the memo arose: that the UN weapons inspection process was manipulated to provide a legal pretext for the war, and that pre-war air strikes were deliberately ramped up in order to soften Iraqi infrastructure in preparation for war, prior to the October congressional vote permitting the invasion.

The term "Downing street memo" is also used to generally describe a larger body of associated or related documents leaked to the public from November 2004 onwards, which date from March 2002 through July 2002—the DSM being the most important.

Although some elements of the US media have portrayed the document as faked or fraudulent, no official sources have questioned its accuracy or disputed its authenticity, despite being questioned directly about it on numerous occasions. Both UK and US officials have since either refused to affirm or deny its content, or else have tacitly validated its authenticity (as when Tony Blair replied to a press conference question by saying "That memo was written before we went to the UN.")

A group of 131 United States Congressmen, led by John Conyers, have repeatedly requested of US President George W. Bush to respond to the contents of the document. A resolution of inquiry was filed by Representative Barbara Lee, which would request that the President and the State Department turn over all relevant information with regard to US policy towards Iraq. The resolution currently has 70 co-sponsors.

Answer 6

Completely=100% Samuel Adams was not President.All politicians are strangers to the truth.

Answer 7

-.0001% then
Samuel Adams: 50%
Abraham Lincoln 50%
Jimmy Carter 50%
Any Bush, read my lips: Negative .0001%

Answer 8

5%. If I could vote 100% to have him impeached, I would do that.

Answer 9

Since nobody has offered any legitimate proof that he's lied in the least, I'll have to say 100%.

I won't hold my breath waiting for any legitimate proof from you liberals.

Answer 10

0%