English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not trying to offend but I was thinking about that?

2007-01-08 07:39:15 · 51 answers · asked by chosen_isaiah61 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

51 answers

Shhh....that's called logic, and people don't like that around here.

2007-01-08 07:41:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 16 9

God did not make it a normal thing, God didn't even make it, people did, and thats why we cant reproduce. When God created us he made male and female with certain body parts that when both used can reproduce. If God wanted us to be homosexual, i think he would give us penises and vaginas so we could choose to be striaght or not, but he didnt, so thats why we should be straight!

2007-01-08 07:54:54 · answer #2 · answered by Andrew G 1 · 2 1

Your question assumes the existence of God (which many dispute and therefore give answers that are irrelevant). However, with that assumption, and knowing that procreation WAS one of God's primary purposes to putting us on the Earth, then it would seem interesting that God would make people that way. But, God may have made Adam and Even one way and then through time changes occurred within certain genes thereby producing gay people. This would take God out of the picture, but also recognize that God does not force or control all things; God allows for natural things to take their course and individuals to make choices. If this is the case, and being gay naturally came about (outside of God), then people are born that way and we should respect them as God's children. (We should respect all people no matter what). Finally, if you are a believer in God, this would not take out of the equation that God specifically forbade homosexual behavior in the Bible, and therefore people who were born with those tendancies would face additional (or different) challenges if they chose to obey God.

That being said, there is insufficient evidence at this time as to whether people are "born" gay or not. I know both those who feel they were and those who chose the lifestyle because it seemed more interesting and exciting.

2007-01-08 08:02:18 · answer #3 · answered by straightup 5 · 0 3

Why do women go through menopause if they can't reproduce afterwards?

Should old be be forbidden to marry if they can't reproduce?

Why did God make people so severely brain damaged or deformed that they can't reproduce? Does that mean they chose to be that way? Let's just say not everyone follows the normal path...physically, mentally, or emotionally...or even in a way such as sexual orientation. That does NOT mean they weren't born that way.

I don't think homosexuality is a "normal" thing, but it is a natural thing that is not really a choice and not necessarily a bad thing either. People are just different.

If it were a choice...how old were you when you thought "you know I could go either way with this sexuality thing, but I choose hetero?" I myself never chose hetero...it just came naturally to me and I suspect it is the same way for homosexuals.

2007-01-08 07:47:25 · answer #4 · answered by Captain Jack 6 · 3 4

This is the best question I've read all day. Why because God did not create Adam in Steve he created Adam and Eve. I read answer on here where people say God made them that way. No, God did not make you that way he gave you freedom. Freedom to be who ever you want to be. And if you are not a strong believer in him the devil, satin can make you believe anything. If God made you a homosexual why did he destroy the city that Lot was in? Please read your Bible's for more info. Also, I have nothing against homosexuals and i do not judge. I live for God.
God Bless You and Your Family

2007-01-08 07:44:45 · answer #5 · answered by Dawnnelle J 3 · 4 2

Normal and natural are two different things.

It may be abnormal to be homosexual, but considering 85% of mammal spcies express some form of homosexuality it is natural.

Besides if god is the creator of all things he created homosexuality as well.

2007-01-08 07:55:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If only people capable of having children are suitable for loving relationships, why are the infertile allowed to marry in a church? God made them that way, but they are unable to reproduce naturally.

Reproduction is not at the heart of every relationship. And since the world is becoming overpopulated, that may be a very good thing.

2007-01-08 07:45:09 · answer #7 · answered by Zafrod 2 · 1 3

Hmm...you are mixing religion with Darwinism. When it comes to evolution, it makes no sense that a species adapts to a life style that hinders reproduction. Not all straight humans can reproduce naturally. Some need fertilization treatments or a surrogate womb. This topic is pretty hard to decipher. It all depends on the personal opinion of the individual. For after all, God is the judge, not us.

2007-01-08 07:44:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Not all heterosexuals can reproduce naturally either. That's why we have clinics for this.

And if it wasn't normal to be homosexual, why would God allow animals to do it as well?

2007-01-08 08:06:24 · answer #9 · answered by Kithy 6 · 1 2

The assumption that the inability to reproduce means God didn't create gays flies in the face of logic. I assume by that reasoning that infertile people weren't created by God either? It was a choice, right?

2007-01-08 07:48:07 · answer #10 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 2 2

Well its natural but I wouldnt say its normal. Its just a mutation. People calling this a logical question are complete morons and need to take some biology lessons.

2007-01-08 07:45:07 · answer #11 · answered by Ballzy 6 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers