English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

It depends.

At a banquet hall/resturant/reception hall, no. The place where you're having the reception would be liable.

If someone is hosting the gathering at their house, or the backyard, or other private location, then whoever is the host/owns the property would be liable.

If you are using a public area and serving alcohol, like a park, then sometimes yes and sometimes no. Most public places like that are owned by the township, and you are required to have some sort of insurance that would protect everyone from being liable. But if you break that rule and don't get that insurance, then not only are you liable but you're also in trouble for not following proper procedure.

2007-01-08 06:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by Pink Denial 6 · 2 0

I consider the no troublesome liquor element. If there is beer and wine accessible, human beings will be at liberty with that. i imagine the quantity you purchase relies upon on the kind of folk you've had. I easily were to numerous weddings the position the alcohol ran out early, and it change right into a significant downer. In 2 cases, some human beings left the reception to bypass get extra alcohol, and it ended up being a huge distraction. on condition that kegs are in all likelihood not a huge cost contained in the full scheme of your wedding ceremony, it in all likelihood is smart to have yet another keg and slightly extra wine. If there is going to be alcohol, then there must be plenty for all of us who chooses to indulge. strong success. also--one wedding ceremony i change into at lately had kegs and then an basic champagne fountain. It worked extremely nicely and that i imagine the travellers loved it.

2016-12-02 00:25:31 · answer #2 · answered by england 4 · 0 0

The exact laws and regulations vary from state to state. In some states, the person who purchases the licorie license is responsible. In some places, the license reguires you to hire trained bar tenders and/or security and those hired staff may be liable instead or as well, depending on the contracts you have with them as well.

Some ways to aviod problems is to:
- make sure bartenders are told to cut off over-indulgant guests
- hire a taxi or driving service to provide safe options for guests
- hire door security to watch that no one leaves and drives drunk

2007-01-08 14:46:28 · answer #3 · answered by Chrys 4 · 0 0

'Mine states in the contract that each person is liable for their own drinking and the Establishment and bartenders are not responsible for anyone.

We however are getting a bus to take everyone back to the hotel so if anyone seems like they can't drive- they are getting on the bus. Bride's ORDERS!!

2007-01-08 07:24:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Where do you live?
In Canada there was recently a case in the Supreme Court when it was proved that a person serving liquor was not liable (FINALLY MAKE ADULTS BE ADULTS).
I wouldn't risk it personally pay for the insurance I was quoted just over $100.00 for my wedding money well wasted.(I didn't need to use it)

2007-01-08 08:10:04 · answer #5 · answered by emmandal 4 · 0 0

If you're renting a place, part of the payment should include "host liquor liability." Check the contract.

And yes, as a host you could be liable.

2007-01-08 06:44:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Liable for what? if you want to avoid any problems, just ask the bartender to limit the amount of drinks to people. I mean its common sense that if a bartender has a drunk person asking for more that they refuse...it is a wedding not happy hour.

2007-01-08 06:43:14 · answer #7 · answered by cib0385 4 · 1 2

depends on where the wedding is. if its at an establishment with a bar, a liquir licence and a bar tender...then No...the establishemtn is liable.

2007-01-08 06:53:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes i think so talk to an insurance agent and also the venue
who is supplieing the bartenders, alcohol ect.
have a great time

2007-01-08 07:29:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In the society that liberalism (the mental disorder) has created most likely.

Liberal leftist extremists hate personal responsibility and are always looking for someone else to blame. In this particular case, the idiot who got liquored up should be responsible, and no one else.

2007-01-08 07:04:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers