Accordring to most acceptable views supported by logic & rationality the process of evolution,was guided by some supereme mind(god) and as a starting point of every species including humans females were created/evolved.these were sort of super females,who can reproduce by thier own(i.e without male fertization)so they give births & when offsprings matured,the females among them also got dual-properties,i.e either give birth by male fertilization or even without them(if males absent),then gradually over time span thier this ability got vanished.also not single female was created/evolved,there were many in various regions of earth simultanously.
As i believes that"holy mary"was virgin and poise woman.she give birth to "holy jesus" and world wide in nearly all religons it is believed that it was a"miracle"
now as per above here goes my question:
can we assume that mary give birth to jesus by gods will and her same chemistry got activated,which was associated with primative females?
2007-01-08 06:10:59 · 18 answers · asked by Shak 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I don't believe that. I believe the Biblical account of Creation.
2007-01-08 06:14:03 · answer #1 · answered by lookn2cjc 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You said, "Accordring to most acceptable views supported by logic & rationality the process of evolution,was guided by some supereme mind" I don't think that is true, but even if it was true, you assume that it's the Christian God. That's a far leap considering all the Dieities there are.
It's been speculated that lightening hit the ocean which sparked life on Earth. This is a the joining of the God and Goddess as described by allegory in Pagan texts.. The super females that you describe is what Pagans consider the early stage of the Goddess. If you are really interested you should read Aradia: The Gospel of the Witches by Charles Leland. Its a world renowned book. It explains the ancient pre-biblical story Vangello delle Streghe.
The problem with the Christian version is that the downplay the female, In the Pagan version, the two are equal as they should be.
The idea of virgin birth is originally a Pagan one so to assume that it is all of Christian origin is ludicrous because these stories predate Christianity by many thousands of years. I enjoy your insight. Feel free to contact me for further discussion.
2007-01-08 15:31:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
 Matthew 11:25...At that time Jesus said in response: “I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and intellectual ones and have revealed them to babes.
Matthew 1:18... But the birth of Jesus Christ was in this way. During the time his mother Mary was promised in marriage to Joseph, she was found to be pregnant by holy spirit before they were united.
2007-01-08 14:24:18 · answer #3 · answered by papa G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You seem to be reading into the mystical and mythical religion - Gnostics.
The Blessed Virgin Mary was mother of Christ,
immaculately conceived through the Holy Spirit.
2007-01-08 14:51:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This was not THE ULTIMATE question. I call false adverstisment.
If mary gave birth of herself because of a dual GENDER hyposthesis, then Jesus chould NOT claim that God was his Father. The divinity and diety of christ comes through a genalogy of justification and though jesus was legally adopted by Joseph, it still makes The Son of God the holy sacrificial lamb and inheritor of the throne of christ.
2007-01-08 14:19:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To assume would mean that there is nothing stated about Mary. I believe by faith what I've read in the Bible about Mary being impregnated by the Holy Spirit. I believe and am not ashamed. I wish you well.
2007-01-08 14:16:05 · answer #6 · answered by Execusuite 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK to do know that mammals have never been asexual right and there is no god in evolution did you just randomly come up with this question or did you thank it through at like normal people??
(proud "nonbeliever" also known as atheist)
2007-01-08 14:19:01 · answer #7 · answered by cthulhu will raise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Acceptable to who? Over 90% of american scientists and british scientists would argue against theistic evolution.
Further, humans have never in recorded knowledge EVER procreated by parthenogenesis. In fact, this extends to most species on the planet. Parthenogenesis is extremly, EXTREMELY rare.
You've used the term Evolution even though you clearly have no CLUE what it means.
2007-01-08 14:14:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is no widely supported view that the process of evolution was guided by some supreme mind, so the rest of your question is moot.
oh yeah, and god is imaginary. That's a fact.
2007-01-08 14:14:32 · answer #9 · answered by atheist jesus 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
WHAT IS BORN OF MAN IS MAN/WHAT IS BORN OF GOD IS AN ANGEL HAVING HIGHER KNOWLEDGE AND WISDOM.I WAS THE FIRST BORN AND MY MOM WAS A VIRGIN.THERE WAS SOME KIND OF STORY ABOUT MY MOM FOOLING AROUND,SHE SAID SHE WAS VIRGIN.A MIRACLE YOU JUST CANT EXPLAIN,THAT'S WHY IT IS A MIRACLE AND ONLY COME TO THE UNDERSTANDING THROUGH THE FAITH WITHIN YOUR SOUL,THE LIGHT OF WISDOM IS IN KNOWING ONE SELF IN THE LIGHT OF YOUR SPIRIT.ALL TO THIS DAY,ALL OF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN LIVING IN THE TRUTH SINCE THE VERY BEGINNING.IT WAS ADAM THAT GAVE EVE THE APPLE,FOR WHO HAS THE ADAMS APPLE.WOMEN BRING LIFE AND LOVE INTO THE WORLD,MAN BRINGS DEATH AND HATE.THAT IS THE TRUTH
2007-01-08 14:31:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christians should not stop believing the truth just because some loco comes up with a wierd theory. Likewise, we should not accept "alterative lifestyles" just because it's in "vogue" to act like unthinking animals. Just because you believe we come from apes you don't have to act like one.
2007-01-08 14:29:44 · answer #11 · answered by bacha2_33461 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋