2007-01-08 05:31:17 · 7 answers · asked by bubbacornflakes 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I was disappointed when the term began to refer to Republican prowar draft dogers, feeling that it need to stay with Foley type folk.
But so many have proven to fit both descriptions.... well I would still prefer that there were two different words like CH1 and CH2 but the word does make sense both ways.
2007-01-08 05:40:22 · answer #1 · answered by No Bushrons 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I served in the U.S. Army for 4 years, so I am neither of these things.
2007-01-08 14:08:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This refers to the Democrats and liberals and nobody else!!
2007-01-08 13:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Arguably, both apply (at least in spirit) to Bill Clinton, so I guess not.
2007-01-08 13:41:51 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ummm,
I believe it refers to the democrats wanting to tuck their tail between their legs and cut and run every time there is a conflict.
Wimps!
2007-01-08 13:33:43 · answer #5 · answered by patrioticpeladac 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Chicken refers to the Liberals that don't serve......
2007-01-08 13:33:51 · answer #6 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Did you serve?
If not, how do you fit into this coincidence?
2007-01-08 13:35:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋