English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

too low, I have a very heavy foot.

2007-01-08 04:59:16 · answer #1 · answered by Bilinda G 6 · 1 1

I think that most municipal speed limits are about where they should be. Controlled access highways are a different story. Emperical evidence shows that it is safest to have no set speed limit. The state of Montana (where I live) removed speed limits from it's interstate and state highways during the late 90's. It proved to be the safest period per mile driven in the history of the state.The highways were still patrolled and citations could be written for wreckless driving, which was something unsafe and depended on road conditions. On a clear summer day with little traffic 120-140mph was perfectly legal and often done. On a winter icy day 50mph might be unreasonable.
Speed limits were reenacted due to pressure from the federal government. ie we'll give you highway money if you put back the speed limits. Also the autobahn is another good example. No limit, but similar to montana's highways it is patroled and you can be stopped for dangerous driving.

Allowing the individual to choose what is safest for them in a contolled situation such as controlled access highway has shown to be the safest method of speed regulation. This happens becasue many people feel that the speed limit is either the minimum or some type of speed that should be safe in all conditions and it is not. Thus many sheeple will just drive the speed limit regardless of traffic or conditions. (just take a drive through Utah in the winter and you will see).

So on highways the speed is best to be left to the driver. When a driver makes a conscious decision about what is safe they are more likely to think about the conditions of the road, their vehicle, and their level of risk and drive accordingly.

2007-01-08 05:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by JetboyToy 3 · 3 0

Both. I drive for a living, and travel all 48 states (and sometimes Canada). Some places the speed limit is truly too high for the amount of traffic and the number of on/off ramps. Other places, (hello, Oregon, Idaho, Illinois, Canada) the speed limit is too low in the rural areas. Most, however, are just about right. If you want to drive faster, move to west Texas. Parts of I-20 and I-10 are 80 mph now.

2007-01-08 04:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by J.R. 6 · 2 0

The interstate highways in this country are designed for higher sppeds however the drivers in the United States as a rule can't drive worth a damn at any speed. They maintain low speed limits because of this.

2007-01-08 07:08:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

speed limits are no longer plenty the priority, particularly. while in comparison with the autobahn, which has a plenty greater protection checklist than we do, right this is the place we are falling short: a million) we don't address "highway rage" aggressively adequate. In Deutschland, you change somebody off and you are going to reformatory. Slam. 2) we don't crack down on lane changing adequate. In Deutschland, you %. a speed, you %. a lane, and you friggin' stay there. Rechtsfahren, rechtsfahren, rechtsfahren. Slower site visitors on the best. bypass on the best? do no longer bypass go, do no longer collect $2 hundred, go directly to reformatory. Slam. 3) we've too many go out and front ramps. site visitors's everywhere. It should not be sensible to swerve onto the line and 30 seconds later swerve off on an go out on the choice side. Highways could desire to be for distance holiday purely. 4) we've not funded, on a central authority point, public transportation. we've dumped billions into federal investment for highways rather. we've not got holiday thoughts, so we could desire to combat it out on the highways. 5) Our roadbeds are 0.5 as thick as Deutschland's. subsequently, our summers are beset with ripped up roads and detours. We enhance orange barrels like it rather is corn in the summer time. Our highways are in consistent want of restore. when you consider that our highways are set up and controlled all incorrect, we could desire to shelter slow speeds to have some semblance of protection. i does not propose raising the speeds till we restoration those different issues first.

2016-11-27 20:00:42 · answer #5 · answered by krausz 4 · 0 0

Ohio is to low.(55 big trucks, 65 cars) Worst of all they enforce it. Illinois on the other hand is the same as the Buckeye State but I've found it might as well be 65 for big trucks and 75 for cars. There pretty liberal enforcing it in Lincoln Land.

2007-01-08 13:28:00 · answer #6 · answered by MOLLY 2 · 0 0

I think they need to go up a little bit. So I think they are too low cause I have a need for Speed.

2007-01-08 05:08:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Too low for me, too high for the rest of the morons out there

2007-01-08 04:53:08 · answer #8 · answered by True Grits 3 · 2 0

Low. Way too low.

2007-01-08 04:52:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They are just right. 60 mph is the speed at which almost any car will get its optimum gas mileage

2007-01-08 04:59:45 · answer #10 · answered by fish guy 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers