There seems to be a group of people among us who are very angry about this stem cell development. They are mad because killing babies is no longer necessary. It seems they were never interested in saving people, they were only in it for the murdering babies part. Is the devil loose among us? Are people actually infected with demons? Why do you want to kill babies so badly?
2007-01-08 03:58:01 · 15 answers · asked by Neocoon 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Too damn many questions rolled into one!!!
To answer the very first, I have a dear friend with a spinal injury, and is a quadriplegic. Yes, I support stem cell research whole heatedly.
2007-01-08 04:01:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thoroughly consider you. i hit upon it exciting also that you're literally not a Republican. i myself am a Democrat and that i'm thoroughly adverse to embreyonic stem cellular learn. If scientists might want to easily dedicate to attempting to make advances with human being stem cells or twine blood stem cells, many of the ailments that they so oftentimes web site might want to extremely be cured without destroying human life. it really is carefully unethical to create life basically to damage it. Why could a human toddler could die to save a human being that has already loved an total life. The fact that an embreyonic cellular isn't human life is preposterous. some day technological information will attain the point the position a baby will have the capacity to live on outdoors the womb from even that factor. I hate to assert that I help Bush on some thing, yet I surely am satisfied about him vetoing the bill. human being stem cellular learn could go ahead, yet embreyonic stem cellular learn is carefully unethical.
2016-12-28 09:45:04 · answer #2 · answered by regula 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not well versed in this new stem cell source, but if you are correct, I cannot imagine why anyone would get upset about another way of obtaining them.
I do admit, even though I am pro-choice, that there are some people I have encountered that only supported stem cell research because they thought it helped in the argument against the pro-lifers.
2007-01-08 04:04:11 · answer #3 · answered by Bow down to me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure.......You are speaking of the new amneotic
It is fine
Adult stem cell is fine
Embryonic is not fine
2007-01-08 04:08:23 · answer #4 · answered by kenny p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am all for this new source or stem cells. There is no harm to mother or fetus with promising results. However, it should be noted that there have been ZERO beneficial results from embryonic stem cell research and many many break-throughs from adult stem cell research.
2007-01-08 04:08:03 · answer #5 · answered by LeBizzle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. It isn't necessary to kill babies to do stem cell research. I am for this way of doing it.
2007-01-08 04:00:43 · answer #6 · answered by RB 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad there may be an alternate way of gathering stem cells that does not involve the destruction of embryonic cells. I think there is still a long wayto go though.
2007-01-08 04:02:17 · answer #7 · answered by philyra2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I was in support of stem cell research to begin with, and it never "required killing babies." The researchers wanted to use miscarriages or fetuses that were still-born for their research.
2007-01-08 04:00:54 · answer #8 · answered by Maverick 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's still being researched at Wake Forest U. Amniotic sacs. Looks promising, but don't count your stem cells before they've hatched.
2007-01-08 03:59:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Babies? The perfectly adequate English word is foetus/fetus.
Oh and they are discarded groups of cells, not really even a foetus.
2007-01-08 03:59:46 · answer #10 · answered by fourmorebeers 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋