The piece of land was given to the Jews by God for generations to come. And nobody has the right to say they are to be removed.
Saying that the Jews did this and that and therefore they are this and that is pure rubbish. Nobody can pass a judgement on God's people and get away with it.
2007-01-07 22:03:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Marshal 2
·
1⤊
5⤋
Do you think that the situation is the same now as when God wished for Israel to be blessed or have they completed their part in the progression of things. Are the zionests actually the children of promise or a warlike people who adopted Judaism in Asia Minor and have been transplanted where the promise was made to others.
look up Khazars. Thes are not the children of promise and in the current scheme of things Israel has been temporarily set aside. This is the age of grace which was a complete mystery to the Jews of old because it was never mentioned in the Torah or the prophets.
Check out the word mystery in your concordance and learn where the source of this common error comes from.
2007-01-07 22:13:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by icheeknows 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel was given to the Jews after the war by the allies. They had a choice of three locations. Israel, Western australia and somewhere in northern Africa. I don"t think the jews should of been given Israel they had to replace the people living there at the time. It is only a line drawn in the sand to separate countries in the middle east. The Arabs have been in the area for thousands of years without borders. Still the past is the past and Israel is so they will have to learn to all get along.
2007-01-07 22:13:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by spils 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
People like you make me laugh.The psycho Iranian president?
What makes you any different with the views that you have.
Put it this way The only ones exercising force,brutality and terror to people are Israel who have taken the land by force.
Israels denys Christian and Muslims access to Jerusalem.
If you think God accepts behavior and actions you are highly mistaken.
2007-01-07 22:16:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sherzade 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, the Jews have time and time again proved unworthy to have Israel or Jerusalem. That is why God has prevented them from having the "temple mount" because the Muslims have proved their worth to God. God will never let the "temple mount" fall into the hands of the Jews, until and unless they embrace Islam... no offense to Jews.
2007-01-07 22:35:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mustafa 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Jews deserve it because God "favors" them? Man, that's the biggest load of crap I've ever heard.
I'll tell you what, when you can go to a congress, parliament, sabor, or any other type of branch of government in this world, and they accept your "God favors my plan" or "God favors so and so" then make the statement. No sane person would ever accept a "God favors. . ." plan in politics. That's fixed, it would never work. So take your *God in politics* nonsense back to the 700 Club.
Who should have Israel or Palestine? They should share it like they've been doing for the past 2000 something years.
2007-01-08 02:39:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by LaissezFaire 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
curiously that's a minimum of rather helpful in stifling dissent or they does not do it. i will could desire to provide it attempt and notice what happens. i've got considered a great form of people get accused of it yet i've got not at all everyday of every physique to ask if the accuser replaced into in my view Jewish in any experience. So i assume it rather is not proper. base line: from now on every physique who dares to even think of something extreme of me is to be castigated in a maximum Vociferous trend as certainly one of those gosh-darn anti-semite neo-nazi pores and skin-head holocaust deniers with secret connections to David Duke and Iran as properly. Frankly,at this factor the term has so little credibility left after an prolonged time of abuse and overuse it rather is like rain going off a tin roof. yet journalists are nonetheless fearful of it,so there's a job forward for the destiny. I see no reason reportorial concern of this stale accusation should not be coated in the subsequent version of the Diagnostic indicators Manuel as an identifiable phobia. this is to declare,as an irrational concern.
2016-11-27 19:14:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by duque 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No human can truly own it or any other part of the earth, the forces of nature or God, whatever name you choose to call your God, could wipe out the human species in an instant. Anyone who thinks they own anything, pay attention next time you see where a storm has reduced everything a person thought they owned, to nothing, all in a very short time!
2007-01-07 22:01:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Jews do not have any stake in al-Quds (Holy Land), because even though they may have lived in the land previously, that land now belongs to the Muslims from two points of view:
1. The Jews disbelieved by changing the religion of God and taking partners along with Him and are no longer following the religion of the believers among the Children of Israel who followed and supported Moses and Jesus (peace be upon them).
2. Muslims have more right to it than them, because land does not belong to the people who lived there first, but to those who establish the laws of Allaah therein. Allaah created the land, and He created people to worship Allaah in the land and to establish therein the religion, laws and rulings of Allaah. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “… Verily, the earth is Allaah’s. He gives it as a heritage to whom He wills of His slaves; and the (blessed) end is for the Muttaqoon (the pious).” [Quran 7:128]
Hence if some Arabs came who were not followers of Islam and they ruled the land with kufr (disbelief), they would have to be fought until they submitted to the rule of Islam or were killed.
It is not the matter of race or ethnicity; it is the matter of Tawheed (monotheism) and Islam (submission to the will of Allah in peace).
Here it is useful to quote the words of one of the researchers:
“History tells us that the first people to settle in Palestine were the Canaanites, six thousand years BCE. They were an Arab tribe who came to Palestine from the Arabian Peninsula, and after their arrival, Palestine was named after them [i.e., Canaan].”
(al-Suhyooniyyah, Nash’atuhaa, Tanzeemaatuhaa, Inshitatuhaa, by Ahmad al-‘Awadi, p. 7).
“As for the Jews, the first time they entered Palestine was approximately six hundred years after Abraham had entered the land, i.e., they entered it approximately 1400 years BCE. So the Canaanites entered Palestine and lived there approximately 4500 years before the Jews.”
(Ibid., p. 8)
Hence it is clear that the Jews have no right to the land, whether according to religious law or in terms of who lived there first and possessed the land. They are aggressors who are seizing the land by force. We ask Allaah to rid Bayt al-Maqdis (Jerusalem) of them sooner rather than later, for He is Able to do that and He is Most Generous in answering. Praise be to Allaah, the Lord of the Worlds.
2007-01-07 22:13:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by smarttab2525 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assalamoalaikum wa rahmatullahi wa baraqatuhu
May peace, blessings and mercy of Allah be on all of you.
******************************************************
Who should have Palestine (not Israel), the jews who lived there 5000 years back or Muslims who were living there peacefully for 1000 of years and then jewish terrorists kicked them out of there forcefully.
Muslims I am with you go and get the Holy Land back.Ahmedinejad is great.Hamas is great.Hizbullah is great.Long live Palestine.
2007-01-07 22:29:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hassaan 2
·
2⤊
0⤋