English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yeah, question as stated above, the girl doesn't receive *physical* pleasure & none of her "privates" are shown, so does it still count as breaking the vow? What about from the guy's view, since there is no penetration? Thanks.

2007-01-07 17:53:31 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

Haha thanks guys for the answers, um I think I chose to wait more for religious reasons, and it was him telling me it didn't really count and that it was alright, I guess I definitely fell for it..!

13 yes it is
7 no it isn't
out of those who answered decisively

Thanks guys for your advice =]

2007-01-07 18:13:53 · update #1

24 answers

Ummm . . . I think it's getting pretty close. You should be at LEAST engaged, if not married. I think it would be best to limit things to heavy petting before marriage. Good night!

2007-01-07 17:58:29 · answer #1 · answered by anonymous 7 · 1 0

this is not dishonest to have premarital sex- yet then, what do i understand, by your good judgment i have already 'cheated' on my destiny husband. i'm not advocating premarital sex, i can see that it truly is a controversial challenge, inspite of the indisputable fact that i don't believe of that between the arguments hostile to it truly is that it truly is deceptive. Princeton be conscious internet internet defines dishonest as: "adulterous: not straightforward to an more desirable 0.5 or lover" once you've not any better 0.5 or lover on the time the premarital sex takes position, then you truthfully are literally not dishonest. the reason dishonest is frowned upon is because you're breaking a dedication to somebody else, abusing their have self assurance. If this dedication has not yet been made (you may want to not have even met your destiny better 0.5 yet) then there is no breaking of a dedication or abuse of have self assurance. And, yet another element, what makes you so particular you'll even get married? some human beings stay their complete lives without ever getting married.

2016-12-02 00:00:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In my opinion, it depends on why you are choosing to abstain until marriage.

If it's for a Christian reason, then you are cheating on your vow. You would be causing him to sin, and thus you are sinning...

However, if you are chosing to abstain because you want to save your technical virginity or you don't want to get pregnant, then you are not.

I think oral sex is a great way to avoid pregnancy and if you have sex too young, you can seriously increase your risk of certain female cancers. Of course, you do run the risk of putting yourself in a situation where you might feel you can't control yourself.

It sounds cheesey, but just follow your heart. Make choices based on your heart and your head. If you are not married, use protection, consider going on the pill and always know your partners sexual history.

Good Luck.

2007-01-07 18:05:06 · answer #3 · answered by Tiff 5 · 1 0

Whoah!! Jeepers!! Ask Ex-President Clinton!! He didn't seem to think that oral sex involved him at all. And he was sending in a cigar as a proxy. I can't believe this guy's getting **** job's from you while you think you're saving something special for him!!
Do you really think the most satisfaction HE will receive is when he knows YOU are pleasured? Hello??? You have so much to learn about men. And about what they think of using women as waste receptacles. Go slowly Honey. Oral sex is oral SEX!!

2007-01-07 18:00:06 · answer #4 · answered by Dovey 7 · 0 0

It is not cheating, but can you stop just short of penetration ? You have broken no vow as long as you can stop just short of penetration. It is like going to the edge of a steep cliff and looking down, one wrong move and you are down.
But it may be difficult to convince your jealour partner/lover. They insist on a higher standard. But you can rest with a clear conscience, for showing so much control by stopping just short of penetration .

2007-01-07 18:00:20 · answer #5 · answered by wizard of the East 7 · 0 0

Well - I would think it would be breaking the vow...

I was never under that belief but when others have told me that they didn't or won't have sex until they're married - I find it odd that they would think oral sex somehow is less intimate or appropriate. It's all a form of sex.

2007-01-07 17:58:02 · answer #6 · answered by karespromise 4 · 1 0

It is sex, and so what? It is all in the family if you have committed yourselves to marriage.....and what if you have not? Try on your shoes before you buy them. Ninety per cent of single girls have had sex by age thirty and it is not wrong unless you want to think so. There is no more enjoyable activity in the universe. God made it that way for you to get you to procreate. Don't miss the opportunity because of outdated and rarely adhered to values. And don't get careless and breed indiscriminately.

2007-01-07 18:09:21 · answer #7 · answered by syrious 5 · 0 0

no penetration? yes, not in the vagina, but isnt he penetrating your mouth?

might as well go for your a-s-s once you are using this logic. either be celibate or don't be. it's safer to just have sex w/ a condom than doing all of this oral. that's how there were all these outbreaks of STDs at high schools. nobody has sex - they just do oral and spread chlamydia, gonnorhea, and i think syphallis even.

2007-01-07 17:56:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It depends on your personal beliefs. If you're asking if the church perceives it as a sin, then I'm guessing yes. They're a bunch of prudes.

2007-01-07 17:55:44 · answer #9 · answered by Ashlee S 4 · 1 0

Yep, it's premarital sex! And it's pretty one sided if you are giving head then there isn't any reason you shouldn't be getting some too!

2007-01-07 17:56:47 · answer #10 · answered by Maria C 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers