Yes, yes, yes...I know that the rest of the right wingers would, but what about the Christian fundamentalists who otherwise would fight to the death for their pro-life beliefs?
2007-01-07 16:14:46 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
"Under current United States federal law [3] and most interpretations of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, any individual born within the United States (except for a child of foreign diplomats) is a citizen of the United States, regardless of the legal status or citizenship of that individual’s mother or father. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby
2007-01-07 16:29:06 · update #1
No - I do not support the abortion of any baby.
2007-01-07 16:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
IN very fragile barrier reed setting along many great barrier reefs in the world, a very distructive happenstance has taken place as more and more of the reefs are destroyed by small fishing boats and the like, throwing their anchors into the sensitive coral. This numerous acts of anchor dippping has nearly killed many coral reefs.
AMerica is no different. In the above setting, the countries who own those reeds, don't allow boats to drop anchor within the reef areas. Salvaging th reefs this way.
I believe anchor babies damage our reefs, our country our sanctity and way of life. We need to control this, to stop this, so that our way of life, what has worked for us over the years will not be wasted by this sort of imbicilict and insensitive behavior.
2007-01-07 17:29:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a right wing Christian fundy but here is my stance.
I do not believe in abortion. The child has done nothing wrong to deserve death. I'm not sure what an "anchor baby" is but if it is a deformity, I'm sure God will take care of it, Himself.
That being said, I have a problem with the Federal Government telling a woman what medical procedure she can or can't have.
2007-01-07 16:33:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Craig you for sure don't have a womb and have not have been given any clue what the hell you're on approximately. I even have confronted that selection and that i will enable you comprehend it became the worst week of my existence. i incredibly struggled with the what if and that i became dealing with a well being probability to myself and my infant. i became fortunate it exceeded and the exams got here back nice. yet I now have a competent thought of the alternative that I desire I had in no way been confronted with. I believe abortion to a definite volume, Rape, Abuse, Age of mom, well being of mom and infant incest or maybe in circumstances the place the mum is heavily incapable of asserting her infant. yet for the sake of employing it a contraceptive that I disagree with very lots so. in case you had ever felt a infant circulate interior you and react to you and your emotions you will possibly in no way ask considered one of those question. From the 2nd the pulse is their that infant resides and not basically a area. we are fortunate to have those particular moments until now our young toddlers are born that an fool male or some lunatic femanist cant intefer with that creature that I even have been fortunate sufficient to experience and unite with. notwithstanding infants that die return to heaven people who're born convey a sprint of hevean to the earth. and that i would not supply up.
2016-10-30 07:45:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe every person has there own path to follow making there own decisions along the way based on life learning and experience gained and passed on in knowledge, tempered with belief in a higher being in which we are guided!
Another words to each his own as they are the ones who live with the consciences of there decisions ultimately in the end and will answer before god for any wrongs...
The decision to take a life through abortion could not be an easy one to make, for me it was never the question or the answer and my wife neither (we love both our girls without impunity and would not have them to love if we had made that decision) jut expressing how i feel...sorry!
2007-01-07 16:30:37 · answer #5 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is technically no such thing as an "anchor baby" under the 14th ammendment. Birthright citizenship is given ONLY if the parents are legal U.S. citizens.
Now... As to the question: No, I do not believe in abortion. I do not believe in murdering an innocent child for the sins of its parents.
2007-01-07 16:24:16 · answer #6 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yea and that law was put into place because of babies born to slaves long ago. Its one of many laws that served a purpose at one time but currently makes no sense at all.
But I would doub't the people you describe would support aborting them.
2007-01-07 17:36:22 · answer #7 · answered by sociald 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Anchor Babies is another left wing urban legend. The 14th amendment does not apply to babies of foreign visitors, diplomats, tourists, or illegal aliens. They do not meet the "residency" nor the "jurisdiction" requirement. That is just socilaist bs.
2007-01-07 18:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by Dawes 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't like abortion at all AND don't think there should be "anchor babies" The law should be adjusted as "the times they are a'changing"
A child born here should only have citizenship rights IF their parents are here legally.
That is my opinion and I know I am going to be blasted for it, but there it is.
2007-01-07 16:21:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
I am against abortion; but it is an individuals choice what she wants to do with HER own body. If they are illegal and currently pregnant? Why not deport them before they deliver..
2007-01-07 16:29:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What we can use them for anchors now? Just kidding. No, I do not agree with abortion. I am non religious too, so that is not my reasoning!
2007-01-07 16:29:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋