English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What is the absolute change in particle energy associated with a 1 degC rise in average global temperatures? I would like a refresher on how temperature is related to particle energy. Not exactly a direct relationship is it? Please explain how thermal expansion of water is very real, and greater overall thermal energy can lead to more extreme weather phenomena. Explain how statistical correlation does not indicate causation, however evidence (and you mislead in your other response, as the trends have not been observed from just our lif-time) from such comparision has been so strong that most mainstream scientists (these are the ethical ones that report facts and intertpret data without bias of personal gain) agree that anthropogenic global warniming and the resultant climate change is indeed fact, much like evolution and atomic theory. As a scientist, you must surely understand that no one explantion can be proven, but there are some damn good ones w/ great predictive value.

2007-01-07 15:51:19 · 5 answers · asked by Ruben Z 2 in Environment

5 answers

How willing are you to take a gamble on the lives of your children or grandchildren.

The science of everything has always been scrutinized. But I must ask you...are we experiencing extreme weather patterns? We are. Are extreme weather patterns a normal phenomenon? Yes they are. Have humans been around long enoug to experience the severe weather changes that the earth has seen recently? The answer is NO. So, since we have really only influenced anything globally in the last two hundred years or so, and the world weather patterns seem to be accelerating faster, how can you NOT make some correlation.

To not at least examine our activity on earth as somewhat overbearing is to deny reality.

2007-01-07 16:09:11 · answer #1 · answered by huckleberry 5 · 0 0

sure it has develop right into a faith and Al Gore is the pope of the cult.imagine of how a lot funds particular communities will make off of the hype.imagine of all that authorities funds going to "analyze".as well there is basically a lot you may do ,regardless of each and every thing whoever controls the elements controls the international.concern is the perfect political motivator. climate replace is portion of the nature of the planet.ordinary experience is to have sparkling ability yet until eventually there's a dollar in all of it that takes position is communicate,communicate and more desirable communicate.authorities guidelines,fines and consequences(gotta get that bailout funds someplace) We actual choose sparkling air and water .i'm the unique recycler and that i do not waste ability resembling many different individuals.i exploit ability and do not bypass for the "guilt" holiday of doing so. I actually have a difficulty with Gore the guru who flies round a gas guzzling jet.So does Queen Pelosi who opted for a higher one to fly decrease from side to side to California.undergo in concepts her declaring she needs to maintain the planet,yeah she flies we walk.we may be able to all commence through utilising the hot ability saving mild bulbs. Oh I forgot they are those with mercury in them.Oh,nicely sounds like a superb theory on the time. i wager you all heard that some genius flesh presser needed to tax cow farmers for any that own more desirable than one hundred for emitting "methane gas" yeah that's genuine.will we bottle it as a change?Or on 2d idea deliver some from the bull to that flesh presser as he's conscious the B.S. at the same time as he sees or smells it.

2016-10-17 00:13:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You make a very good point about statistics and causation versus correlation. All the people who insist that global warming is caused by big oil companies should 1. turn off their lights, 2. stop driving their SUV's, and 3. realize that not all scientists agree that global warming is caused by humans. The source below lists hard and solid FACTS about what is happening in our environment.

2007-01-07 17:17:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well since you've not specified a mass one can only convert to potential energy.

Use the Einstein relationship for the quivalence of voltage and temperature:
V = kT/q, then you know what the change in energy is in units of volts.

Sorry, only one answer per question.

2007-01-07 16:31:35 · answer #4 · answered by Radzewicz 6 · 0 0

No more answers..until we get more federal funding to scare people.

2007-01-07 15:59:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers