A commonsense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
Although Fred Hoyle was an atheist, he said that some things he had studied could not have possibly happened by chance.
On this same topic astrophysicist George Greensteen wrote:
"There are three quite separate structures in this story-helium, beryllium, and carbon-and two quite separate resonances. It is hard to see why these nuclei should work together so smoothly…Other nuclear reactions do not proceed by such a remarkable chain of lucky breaks…It is like discovering deep and complex resonances between a car, a bicycle, and a truck. Why should such disparate
2007-01-07 15:05:16 · 17 answers · asked by ? 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
structures mesh together so perfectly? Upon this our existence, and that of every life form in the universe, depends." The Symbiotic Universe, p. 43-44
“As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency - or, rather, Agency - must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit?” -George Greenstein
"The scientist is possessed by the sense of universal causation...His religious feeling takes the form of rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals the intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection. - Albert Einstein (theoretical physicist)
2007-01-07 15:06:30 · update #1
“The more I examine the universe and the details of its architecture, the more evidence I
find that the universe in some sense must have known we were coming.” - Freeman Dyson (physicist)
“The exquisite order displayed by our scientific understanding of the physical world calls
for the divine.” - Vera Kistiakowsky (physicist)
"For the scientist who has lived his dream by faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries." - Robert Jastrow (astronomer and physicist)
2007-01-07 15:06:55 · update #2
Great scientists like Johannes KEPLER saw God's magnificance and constantly gave praise to God Almighty for his wonderful laws built into nature.
So did Isaac NEWTON.......and he wrote 1 million words about his belief in the Scripture.
The equations of James Clerk Maxwelll attest to the Magnificant mathematical inginuity of the Creator.
Its only the ignorant who can't figure it out.
2007-01-07 15:06:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Maybe so, but there are a whole host of ways to interpret this. My suspicion is though (and I could be wrong) that you're just waiting to spring some Christian Bible passages on anyone who would agree that something beyond what is recognized by science is at work in the universe.
Cultures throughout history and the world have explained why things are the way they are in different ways. Christians think that they alone have the only possible explanation, and that to think that there is a principal or being of order at work automatically = the Christian God of the Bible. Not so.
2007-01-07 15:11:28 · answer #2 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad that the universe is so transparent to you. I think that they are biased. And not only that, but things are now happening that are unexpected, and not known anomolies that occur, and they can reoccur now by running the same experiment. There are unknown forces. And they occur under the right circumstances. Physicists make mistakes. There are forces that they only have just discovered and have not been able to explain.
Perhaps you aren't up on the news?
2007-01-07 15:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does all of us understand why adult men like Roddy Piper? hogan, Ted Dibiase? hogan, Curt Hennig? hogan, British Bulldog? hogan and hbk, Scott hall? shawn micheals, etc. in no way received a significant singles global championship? They were all deserving of it, yet is there any particular reason those adult men in no way did? triple h, hbk, hulk hogan, vince your accepted lot extremely. Bonus question: What retired? arn anderson, deceased? mike impressive, or inactive wrestler that in no way received a global identify change into maximum deserving of one? jesse ventura change into merely colourful and could were a global champion and that i idea change into maximum deserving. edit: booker t and rvd were screwed by triple h and were consistently made to look susceptible hostile to him so i agre joker dude.
2016-12-01 23:51:37 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you have a point?
Galileo recanted and the church confined him to his house for the rest of his life. Seems like religion is ready to persecute anyone for telling the truth. Good reason for scientists to allow existence of god.
2007-01-07 15:08:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll wait for the short version of this question
2007-01-07 15:07:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you folks insist Evolution came about by chance?
2007-01-07 15:06:47 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Please read the reference, which addresses this matter (and many others) in detail. A full discussion is too long to post here.
2007-01-07 15:20:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You really need to get a life, or at least a girlfriend...
2007-01-07 15:09:34 · answer #9 · answered by oscpressgirl66 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm sorry but maybe if it was in person i would understand..or if i was older...
i'll get back to ya in a couple years
2007-01-07 15:07:40 · answer #10 · answered by MAAR 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋