Darwin's theory had been ripped apart in every aspect of modern science. Through the fossil record, to micro-biology, to physics and the blatant violation of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, to the mathematical impossibility of a random creation of a cell to the Evolution FRAUDS that have found there way into Science text books and National Geographic! How can anyone even take this thing seriously?
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/...
2007-01-07 14:55:29 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'll believe in evolution when I see crocodiles, who have been on earth 250 million years, driving cars - or at least walking upright.
Still waiting .... Still waiting ....
I don't think they're really trying.
2007-01-07 15:05:16 · answer #1 · answered by scourgeoftheleft 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Forget about the 2nd law of thermodynamics. You don't know what that is, and most creationists try and use that as to explain god. Every scientist will agree with Evolution. You forget that science is a self-correcting enterprise. Evolution is a fact, it really happened. Humans don't live long enough to see the effects but the fossils and rocks tell us the sweeping story.
National Geographic was the first to publish Evolution as fact. Sorry.
2007-01-07 15:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
So you can read a propaganda webpage and ape back its comments. What's your point?
What you've written here is simply false. Since you don't know anything about the fossil record, you don't know anything about microbiology or physics, and you have no idea what the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is, honesty would have dictated that you not post this ignorant question. Yet you did anyway. That was a mistake, kid.
And if you're going to call something ridiculous, it'd be prudent to spell the word correctly.
2007-01-07 15:02:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Fossil record -- sound but incomplete.
Microbiology -- best laboratory systems.
Thermodynamic incompatibility -- massive Creationist lie, misapplication of science.
Mathemathical impossibility -- Creationist numbers aren't like other people's numbers. Saying zero equals a small number isn't math in my book.
2007-01-07 17:00:54 · answer #4 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny. I actually work in a microbiology lab. You'd think I would have heard of this microbiological evidence against evolution. Let me go look at this.
Oh, sorry, I can't type a good response, I'm laughing too darn hard at their idea of "science." Whoo. That's a good one.
2007-01-07 15:08:18 · answer #5 · answered by Emmy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are right. It is rediculous. A talking snake gave way to human intelligence – not evolution. No wait, a magic fruit. Sorry.
2007-01-07 15:02:06 · answer #6 · answered by The Killer is Me 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think the 6,000 year story is ridiculous. Life began millions of years ago. We only have recorded history-as people saw it-for 6,000 years. Why does it matter how G-d made things-it all came from G-d.
2007-01-07 15:01:21 · answer #7 · answered by Shossi 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Right here. Actually, I believe that God used evolution to create the world.
2007-01-07 14:59:10 · answer #8 · answered by jill45690 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i believe in the rediculous concept of spellchekc
edit: YES! It has been a long time since a muslim creationist has tried to start something, this will be fun fun fun. Provided that "Proud Believer" actually is muslim and didn't blindly hop onto Harun Yoyo's page...
2007-01-07 14:56:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
"The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption."
Oh, those scientists and their "theories." Pfft, who needs gravity anyway?
2007-01-07 15:22:06 · answer #10 · answered by k d 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.
"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6)
2007-01-07 15:00:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋