If someone was to retaliate, who do you think would be in the most danger the judge, prosecutor, jury or the defense lawyer? There have been cases where people come up murdered because of the outcome of a trial.
2007-01-07 11:07:26 · 22 answers · asked by A_WWE_FAN_4LYFE 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I work for the U.S. Attorney's office and we have had several prosecutors killed.
So I say it's the prosecutor who has the most to lose.
2007-01-07 11:10:19 · answer #1 · answered by Soundjata 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you for your explanation but not so much with your question. I am one of those defense lawyers. I do perform a valuable service. I make sure the prosecution does its job right and doesn't railroad their suspect into an unjust conviction. As for my faith, I defend Christ and God against the ways of the world, the philosophies of men that tell the world that there is no God. The jury is getting false information from the worldly prosecutors and I have to present spiritual evidence to the contrary. If I can create doubt in their atheistic minds that God does live, then I have done my job. I may not actually convert the jury, but I will get them to think it over more carefully and perhaps acknowledge that God might indeed play a part in their lives.
2016-05-23 05:16:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The judge and the lawyers would be in the most danger. I have seen people telling the absolute truth and a lawyer can make them look like a liar by getting them so confused so they don't even know what they just said. A sharp lawyer can manipulate things so bad, maybe I should say good, they can make a pope look like a liar. I can see a loved one or family member getting so upset they go looking for revenge. Also there are some judges that are on the take or have no common sense and should be run out of town.
2007-01-07 13:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think the judge and prosecutor are definately the ones at risk, i really don't think the defense lawyer is in much danger but the jury might be.......altought if they went after the jury they would 100% surely be caught 12 random people with one thing in common is a dead give away.... and why get caught again because your pissed off you where caught the first time?????
2007-01-07 14:08:38 · answer #4 · answered by sikn_shadow_420 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the outcome of trial. All are at stake. Judge for sentencing defendant. Prosecutor for successful prosecution of defendant. Defense lawyer for unsuccessful defense of defendant. I would have to say the jury is at least risk due to their number, kinda impossible to single them out. All if accused is not detained at end of hearing/finding, for example if out on bail. Something would lead me to believe that if the defense lawyer wasn't appointed but hired, he/she might be at most risk. Defendant might take it more personal.
2007-01-07 12:09:26 · answer #5 · answered by Scott S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It actually depends on the specifics of the situation but any of those can be in direct danger. Sometimes members of the jury are targeted during the preceedings.
2007-01-07 11:30:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Jury... They are the ones who help the Judge choose which sentence... The judge can be replaced by someone who would have harsher punishments...
2007-01-07 11:09:40 · answer #7 · answered by Shadow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the prosecutor would be the most likely. Since he is the one making accusations that are sometimes not true, this can make anyone agitated, enough to kill someone.
2007-01-07 11:10:19 · answer #8 · answered by Royal Weirdo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The defense attorney. The perp and their family know them best and know how to reach them the easiest. Also, perps and defense attorneys often disagree about the handling of the case, sometime in a very volatile way.
2007-01-07 15:42:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The prosecutor they set the charge
2007-01-07 11:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by undercovernudist 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋