I found no reference to a prophet named bill or bob coming after Jesus and disputing that he is the Savior.
So the Quran is only as accurate as it is intended to be for its own purposes. So the answer is NO, it certainly is not fair at all.
2007-01-07 10:51:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I see you have not done your homework on this one! The Bible was written long before the Koran. The King James Version is simply the translation that the British crown authorized to be translated using a large committee of translators. This makes it one of the most accurate. There are many inaccuracies in the Koran. Many statements have been proven wrong. Some are even bad quotations from the Bible (poorly quoted) It is obvious that Mohammed did not really understand Judaism, Christianity or even Catholicism. As a result he developed a 'faith' that suited his ambitions....permitting him to kill his enemies and take over cities by force. They still do today.
2007-01-07 18:59:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by rejoiceinthelord 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
How would the Bible(KJV) be translated out of the Quran? Are you saying that the Quran was changed to add it in 1612 when it was first translated? Are you willing to say that all the languages that the Quran is translated into are pure when compared to the original language? I have even seen different versions of the Quran supported my different congregations. Whats with that? You better make sure you get the log out of your own eye before you try taking the speck out of mine.... Jim
2007-01-07 19:31:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Quran contradicts the Good News of the Holy Bible. So is an antichrist book.
2007-01-07 18:58:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by t_a_m_i_l 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Huh??? How can a book written in the 6th century AD (the Qur'an) long after the events of the Bible be more accurate than those books in the Bible which were written at the time of the events themselves? Sounds like you need to do some research on the Bible.
2007-01-07 18:53:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Blessed 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Ha, ha...ha...you made a funny.
You want to compare the writings of the living God and a mad man that wanted to be a prophet?
Let's just look at it this way...
You will know a tree by it's fruit.
Jesus lived a sinless life. Died on the cross for our sins and is sitting at the right hand of the father right now interceding for us. Jesus beat the grave.
Your "prophet" was a murderer and pedophile and is dead in the grave.
Um....let me see which do I think bears good fruit?
I'm thinking I'll stick with Jesus Christ and the Holy Bible.
2007-01-07 18:53:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Salvation is a gift, Eph 2:8-9 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Q'uran has been translated fewer times, and thus is likely closer to its original wording. The bible, having gone through more translation may have some misplaced words and phrases.
This doesn't make one more true than the other, however, since we don't have objective historical sources to compare with.
2007-01-07 18:53:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Emmy 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Christians got they're silly religion from twisting the "god of Abraham" faith all up.
Then they have the nerve, to call the Jewish and Muslim ppl wrong about their own religion. It's completely absurd.
They irony is so so thick, you could beat it with a stick.
I don't know anything about the Quran, but I don't believe in god. <--So I'm leaving that one alone, if you don't mind.
2007-01-07 19:01:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by lilith 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Only if you're as deluded (or dumb) as you appear to be.
G-d is outside time, silly. Why would He speak in Elizabethan English, which went out several centuries ago?
2007-01-07 19:01:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Better known as the Koran, the sacred text of Islam. No, No, No it is not more accurate than the Holy Bilble in any version.
2007-01-07 18:53:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Peach 4
·
1⤊
4⤋