give me a break and shut up ,our troops in iraq are not defending anybody they are making our security WORSE. why is it that whenever anyone criticises the soldiers the reaction is to say you are so bad but they are so good they are defending you.
why is there an assumption that no matter how bad things are in iraq somehow our troops are making it better.they are not making ANYTHING better,they are not stabilising ANYTHING or protecting ANYBODY.so if you support them WHAT are you supporting?maybee it just helps emotionally to think SOMETHING must be good? well not for me.
I dont fear iraquis and i dont believe terrorists are trying to kill me. im not just against bush im against our whole army and im not ashamed of it.its useless and its pathetic and its harmfull.
2007-01-07 08:55:48 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
you guys just cant challenge me thats all.
not one of you can challenge me,you pathetic little guys with no intellect.
2007-01-07 09:03:20 · update #1
curt everything you have said is complete BS.we are trying to dominate them not free them.
2007-01-07 09:05:10 · update #2
devil dog you are a fool and a simple unthinking person.you have not defended my freedom,you have turned this country into a jail my brother.how can someone like you and your brothers defend freedom? idiot.
2007-01-07 09:08:59 · update #3
janice h,how many vietnamese died in vietnam war you stupid person? i bet you dont know,and you dare call me an unintelligent person.your testimonies PROOVE that all of you are unintelligent.not ONE of you has challenged me yet,just insults.not one of you had written HALF of what ive written you little b i t c h.
2007-01-07 09:13:14 · update #4
Why are you using Yahoo! Answers to spout your incoherent ramblings?
2007-01-07 08:59:40 · answer #1 · answered by dealeted 1 · 7⤊ 0⤋
the adult adult males and ladies squaddies defended out Freedom the government exceeded over shape they engaged in a unlawful unconstitutional warfare. until Congress proclaims warfare we are actually not at warfare. Congress in no way declared warfare. So what we get is a President with the flexibility to get rid of our civil liberties without the peoples authority. they set the point to keep away from the form they swore to guard they secure the militia commercial complicated and SPIT on the peoples freedom whilst they Sidestepped what we are, the form. Now what we've is a wide-unfold militia commercial complicated that makes Billions of greenbacks a three hundred and sixty 5 days at our cost. Eisenhower warned us against it. we've it they have sidestepped our freedom the government that did this are criminals./ they did not shelter our freedom. the warriors that DIED they have been there to shelter our freedom and that they served with honor OUR goverment did not HONOR there scarifice whilst they desperate to sidesteped the form.
2016-10-30 06:46:51 · answer #2 · answered by uday 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, if you think it's better in Iraq, go live there. I support our troops because they are doing the job they were given and are willing to die because the President, with the backing of the Congress, told our military to go to war. Do you forget the people who died on 9/11 so soon?
2007-01-08 05:22:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's in my opinion a hard question to answer, the war in the middle east is a big problem. I think the Government thinks that if we are currently at war, the world can call us agreesive. But, if the troops were to be sent out of the middle east, the Muslims, and the middle easterners are, and may be at liberty to attack us.
We are at war. Think, don't they have weapons in the middle east? Iraq? Iran? the UN suspect that they are hiding nuclear weapons. They are trying to do something about it.
2007-01-07 09:09:26 · answer #4 · answered by Aiwo10 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To defend freedom:
Cut spending in DoD to accomodate just special forces (Seals, etc.)
Funnel more money to CIA, National Guard, Coast Guard.
2007-01-07 15:32:57 · answer #5 · answered by democrat13 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We are trying to protect their democracy that we help put in place, and we are trying to keep the insurgents from taking their FREEDOM. And in turn, we want to stabilize Iraq for a safer Middle East and world. Protecting our freedom.
2007-01-07 09:02:33 · answer #6 · answered by Curt 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I had a lot written in response to you, but I realized someone like you would take offense and go crying to YAHOO. You're not worth the trouble, so I just reported your filth.
GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES MILITARY!
2007-01-07 09:39:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You're welcome.
My sacrifices (and those of my brothers & sisters) have ensured that you have the right to make such statements, as uninformed as they are. The military does not make policy; they execute orders. To blame them (as a whole) for the current situation is misguided. And since you have not served in the military, have not been to the region, and have no personal experience, and have only second-hand information, I don't think you are qualified to make a definitive statement about the situation, in particular whether or not their presence is doing any good.
But while I don't think you are qualified to make such a statement, I respect your right to your opinion. And I and glad you choose to express it. Because whether you like it or not, men like me have protected the rights of men like you. Every critical word out of your mouth is like music to my ears. It is a validation of my years of service.
2007-01-07 09:02:46 · answer #8 · answered by Devil Dog '73 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
Hope you are proud of yourself. Read develdogs answer and feel shame that you are so unintelligent. Now go thank the serviceman nearest you for your freedoms, you ungrateful SOB.
2007-01-07 09:06:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
why are you beating on hte troops? It's their job. They did not give the order to go to Iraq. They were told to go and that is why they are there.
2007-01-07 09:42:26 · answer #10 · answered by ur a Dee Dee Dee 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋