English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If global warming is true, which I don't think so. When most of the glaciers and ice caps melt and populations are displaced do to the rise of oceans, you think they would have the technology to transfer the displaced water into outerspace so land mass would stay constant. Sounds expensive, but possible.

2007-01-07 08:43:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

5 answers

No. But how about using water and solar energy to make fuel? Hydrolysis to separate oxygen from hydrogen, and then using the energy that occurs during the bonding together to propel the cars, leaving only water as a by-product.(hydrogen car) This would lessen the effects of harmful emissions that causes the climate change. If the ozone layer gets too thin, water molecules will be lost to the expanding atmosphere, causing too much heat to be trapped for life to to be comfy anyhow. Flooding will be the least of the worries.

2007-01-07 09:05:18 · answer #1 · answered by Emee 3 · 0 0

You don't believe in global warming? Why not? Consider:

-The EPA indicates the average temperature of the Earth’s surface has increased by about 1.2 to 1.4ºF since 1900.
-There is a high level of confidence that the global average temperature during the last few decades was warmer than any comparable period during the last 400 years.
-Present evidence suggests that temperatures at many, but not all, individual locations were higher during the past 25 years than any period of comparable length since A.D. 900.

Yeah, forget all this "science" stuff and "evidence". Let's just base environmental policy on whether the uninformed think global warming is real.

2007-01-07 19:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by JaneDo3526 1 · 0 0

The cost to blast it out of the atmosphere would probably be astronomical based on the number of ships needed to carry water away.

Why not just build a pipeline to Mars and pump it up there. Shouldn't cost more than 10-20 times the annual GDP of the entire earth to do this and Mars would b a great place to visit then. We could have beachfront property up there.

2007-01-07 16:51:49 · answer #3 · answered by bkc99xx 6 · 1 1

I'm sorry to have to say say this, but you are a complete fool.

Global warming is not up for debate, it's a fact.

The only thing that is debatable is whether our industrial activity is causing it, or whether it is a natural occurrence, and the truth is that no-one can be completely sure.
Yet.

2007-01-07 16:53:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

So you don't believe in global warming (check out the polar bears - why are they drowning in record numbers ?)
But . . . you think water transport to outer space is economically feasible ?
Can I get back to you after I stop laughing ?

2007-01-07 16:53:25 · answer #5 · answered by kate 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers