English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I also heard that people who hunt foxes because they say they are pests also breed the foxes to hunt?Is this true?

May i also add anyone who deliberatly harms animals are sick f*cks and deserve to die an agonising death,and if i ever caught anyone doing it they would...thats my opinion,whats yours?

2007-01-07 01:20:07 · 30 answers · asked by emnie 2 in Sports Outdoor Recreation Hunting

Yes,i dont mean to eat,but for leisure,im vege tho.

2007-01-07 01:49:48 · update #1

The delicate balance was screwed up long ago by people hunting animals,now they call them "endangered species".

2007-01-07 02:02:19 · update #2

the only reason i dont eat meat is because i cant eat it without thinking of the animal its come from,and it makes me ill.I think shooting something to eat something is more humane than the way it is done by factories etc,by whacking them on the head and what not.But i mean for fur,or for leisure.People that do it must have mental issues because else they wouldnt be able to bring themselves to do it,infact,they make the human race weaker by being so f*cking crazed so they should be put down.

2007-01-07 03:16:59 · update #3

well "uncle" we have these questions to ask,why would i waste my time to find an old one??people want to answer it,if you didnt want to you didnt need to did you!not trott off!

2007-01-07 04:42:58 · update #4

haha nah im interested in hearing peoples thoughts,i added what i think so im not ribbed by animal activists thinking i support it.When i hear "animal hunting",i think men on dogs chasing foxes,people shooting seals in the head.Now ive learnt that people do it to keep the population down,which is what this is all about isnt it,learning.cheap *** attacks like "i pity you" and "get a life" mean nothing to me,you dont know me.I suggest you read additional comments,and for being so silly i pity YOU.

2007-01-07 06:35:53 · update #5

30 answers

If they wont allow their children be hunted and killed in agony then they shouldn't hunt other animals children.


seems I struck a note with 5 votes against..... (so far)

Yep its easy to kill animals but when the shoes on the other foot or paw..... them im wrong... same people who sing "all things bright and beautiful" at Sunday services....


The hurting vegetable post is hilarious.... how someone can compare a fruit to a fox and try to sound intelligent....wait a min, are these not the same people trying to justify hunting...

2007-01-07 01:23:07 · answer #1 · answered by Leprechaun 2 · 2 10

i think of looking is vast. It gets people outdoors, and it reduces the prospect of animal over-inhabitants (if the guidelines are accompanied). we can't visit the keep and purchase Elk meat or venison. an excellent variety of the beef from looking can't be bought in a universal food market. Meat from wild interest tastes a lot extra effective than beef. it is likewise so a lot extra relaxing to be attentive to which you killed what you're eating. that is like napping under a cover which you made. I extremely have many different clarification why i'm for looking. I grew up in a kin of hunters and my husbands kin is all hunters...No, i'm not a hick or a redneck. I stay in a city and that i've got very advantageous issues. i don't have antlers dazzling on my partitions and that i don't positioned on flannel. i'm a common city lady, who happens to be attentive to a thank you to shoot a rifle.

2016-12-15 17:55:10 · answer #2 · answered by andie 4 · 0 0

I can almost agree, but a few years ago in our area, the deer were so plentiful, they ran out of food, the deer were invading livestock pens and distroying the beef cattle feed. the deer crawl up onto hay and pee on it, and the cattle wont eat the hay. the deer were starving to death, the hyw dept picked on 4-5 deer carcases per mile. The population should have been reduced with a hunting season. Hunters would have eaten the meat, the beef cattle would be saved, and the deer population would not have suffered thru starvation. See my point.? But to just kill a harmless animal, leave it to rot where it was killed, is a whole different story.

2007-01-07 01:33:04 · answer #3 · answered by michael o 5 · 4 0

I think if they're planning to eat the animal they kill that it's fine. It's the same thing as killing an animal in a factory. I think the people that hunt for the hell of it are disgusting. I also think when they hunt animals like wolves, or foxes, just for the fur that it's disgusting.
Humans have been hunting for as long as we've been around. It's what we're meant to do. We're omnivorous.

2007-01-07 01:30:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

There is no point on telling you my thoughts on hunting because by the way your question is going you don't want to hear my thoughts but just to put down hunting. From your question and reading some anwsers, you have talked to people who do not respect the ways of hunting and are just out to shoot to kill. There is more to hunting than that there is the connection with nature and many hunting organizations are also conservation organizations that have a stake in the big game that is hunted so they want to make sure it is around for years to come.

As to answer the fox question yes, they were hunted as pests and some places do breed them as their population have been desimated by over hunting.

Now i guess you should give me an agonising death as I do hunt. I do hunt for food. I hunt to be in the outdoors and to connect with nature, and to help protect it by joining wildlife organizations to rebuild wildlife's habitat. And when I do shoot I know that it will be a good clean and quick kill as I do not want anything I shoot to suffer and if the perfect shot does not present itself I will not shoot. But now you must initiate your agaonising death sentence as you have tunnel vision when it comes to hunting. I pity you.

2007-01-07 06:22:21 · answer #5 · answered by Dan 5 · 1 2

I hunt because it's fun, and the stuff I shoot usually tastes pretty good. If it doesn't taste good, then I don't hunt it, anymore. You might be a vegetarian, but you are eating some living things baby, as well. The seeds to grow that vegetable didn't just miracously appear out of nowhere. Think about that. Vegetarians think they are so high and mighty, yet they are also eating something that was once a living being.

2007-01-07 03:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by esugrad97 5 · 1 2

Hunt is a necessary occupation since the protohistory. But in time, the man (not to say the human being) found necessary to kill his time by practising various hobies. Among these the hunting too. When man was practising the hunting from the necessity of feeding him and his family, all was Ok. But killing animals only to waste his time or because people bore to death, is quite another aspect. And I would name that aspect ferocity and insanity. Disobeying in this way the commendments of the Lord who put all the animals at our hand but for feeding and not for the simple pleasure to kill.

2007-01-07 01:59:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I have seen more foxes ran over on the highway than I have in the wild People that do hunt foxes probably think more of the fox than there dogs, think about it , it's a sport. If these people killed every fox that was chased or hunted they would eliminate their sport. animal rights activists have no business here. Start your own Q&A .

2007-01-07 01:39:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I don't hunt foxes, but since my youth in the country we learned to shoot, it does not bother me although it is not nice to wound an animal or bird, you need to know what you are doing. I only ever went after vermin.
I do occasionally go fishing, both coarse and game.
Being brought up with it, I feel no remorse, however town folk can be a bit funny about it

2007-01-07 01:31:00 · answer #9 · answered by ArskElvis 3 · 3 1

I quite agree with you in some aspects. However, I am not sure if you are a vegetarian. Eating animals is a priviledge for many people. We eat because God provides them for us to eat. Most animals are set for "food" for humans and therefore hunting is vanished in that case. Those animals are chickens, cows, pigs.

As far as wild animals go, they are wild because they are not fit for food. Somehow they deserve to live. Hunting serve two purposes. The first one was describe above, but we don't really do it because there is no need to. In the old days, we do because of food. The second one was for personal enjoyment which I agreed with you the most at this point. There is also the last one which is for safe guard our communitis such as prevent them from going to human places.

2007-01-07 01:34:20 · answer #10 · answered by YourDreamDoc 7 · 0 3

It's may or may not be unfortunate, but sport hunting has been around for a long long time and will probably be around just as long in the future. Personally, I've never hunted anything that I diddn't intend to make a meal out of. Always did it that way and always will.

2007-01-07 01:31:01 · answer #11 · answered by Ricky J. 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers