Iran has not tried to hide its terrorists tendencies. People who enjoy killing people so much cannot be trusted with nukes. If they continue down this path they will be signing their own death warrant and will have only themselves to blame.
2007-01-06 10:14:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
First of all, Dimwit, Bush had absoluitely nothing, nada, zip to do with the hanging of Saddam. He was captured by our glorious G.I's, turned over to the Iraqi's who tried and convicted Saddam, then executed him. Bush was not, in any way, involved with any of that. Get your facts straight. Nations led by fanatics should be held credible for their want and needs for nuclear power. Other smaller nations do not have the power to hold those countries credible, so guess who gets the job? If we don't do it, those fanatic Muslims will take more and more countries into their own control and try to "Rule the World." Instead of an individual like Hitler, the world is dealing with a "Religion" with the exact same aspirations. We all need to unite and fend off these Muslim fanatics before it's too late. You are aware they want to kill you, torture and rape the women in your family and all in the name of Allah. Think about it! I just checked your 360 profile, it's as blank as your brain. Are you hiding?
2007-01-06 10:26:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
perhaps you might check the liberal media feed with the known facts. to answer your questions in no particular order. the sentence for saddam was carried out by an iraqi court and was signed off by the iraqi president. the us had nothing to do with it, no representatives there and turned saddam over to the iraquis before anything happened. human rights arent very useful if your dead. thats what al qaeda wants and they are funding the insurgents in iraq. they have no rules and love to kill westerners...if you dont kill them there they will come here and have attempted to do so several times. the fact that weve had no known successfull attack on domestic soil since nine eleven is direct testimony to the effectiveness of the bush response. its simple...kill or be killed. taliban or al qaeda..its the same. and as far as the nuclear issue. iran has known ties to insurgents and is a known funding source. this isnt a rights issue...its a common sense issue. you dont leave nuclear weapons in the hands of someone that will destroy you. oil and gas have value but again, if your dead the value is negligable...instead of reading the pelosi press releases youll find this info on cnn and also from the rand corp....bottom line to answer your question...its the support of human rights by stopping the senseless killing and torture by the insurgents and by saddam himself.
2007-01-06 10:17:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I only occurred to be channel surfing at some point this previous summer season, as quickly as I occurred upon Bush's impeachment hearings on CSPN. What they have been discussing... Our government knew as certainty that the final of Iraq's WMD's have been desroyed in 1997. The 'cellular chemical autos' that our information confirmed us to be cellular organic and organic weapons labs have been additionally commonplace at that factor to be climate forcasting kit. i don't comprehend why this all only went away, as Bush is to blame, and shown so with the aid of knowledge. it incredibly isn't a warfare approximately 'terrorism', until you think approximately us the terrorists...800,000-a million,two hundred,000 lifeless Iraqi's do. it incredibly is all relating to the international economic enterprise/Federal Reserve enjoying Monopoly, and putting togeather the products mandatory to enact the hot international Order. CFR member Obama will proceed this legacy, because of the fact the CFR schedule trumps usa's hobbies. Iran is next.
2016-10-30 04:45:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does it ever appear to you that when people attack us on 911, they pissed us off ? The Taliban is some example of a kinder and gentler Government. As far as Saddam, he killed about 1 million people because they didn't agree with him. What about his invasion of Kuwait ? As far as Iran, any country that openly calls for the destruction of another country neither deserves or should get anywhere near nuclear. Iraqi's hung Saddam not the US.
2007-01-06 10:16:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by meathead 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
I bet you don't mind about the hundreds of thousands getting raped and slaughtered for the last three yrs in Darfur/Chad including helpless defenseless children.
2007-01-06 10:47:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That does it.
Your Foreign Aid is cut off until you achieve freedom in your own country.
INSTEAD OF WORRYING ABOUT BUSH, WHY AREN'T YOU FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY?
(But you can rejoice in the fact that our little liberal American Haters will agree with you. But they don't speak for the real USA.)
2007-01-06 10:14:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Gee another little muslim degenerate who disagrees with his savior president Bush and the little mouse is mouthing off about something he knows nothing of.
What ru you going to do when the oil and gas runs out little mouseie.
2007-01-06 10:15:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I swear, are all of you that naive? I suppose you don't really think that Iran will blow Israel off the face of the map if given the chance? And the big, bad U.S. has done nothing but hurt people in Iraq & Afaganistan? Whatever..........
2007-01-06 10:14:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sandra 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
A challenging question (though I wish you had used the spell check). There is no good reason to perform a bad action. What Bush and others did both in Afghanistan and more especially in Iraq was at best a war crime. The whole batch in leadership positions should be tried for treason, violation of their oath of office, various war crimes, and be removed from office, and probably hung.
2007-01-06 10:14:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by hasse_john 7
·
1⤊
5⤋