2007-01-06 07:05:34 · 19 answers · asked by ImaGman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It did happen, so no matter what anyone says, this question can't be honestly answered.
2007-01-06 07:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Need Answers 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most Muslims supported the war in Afghanistan because they were harboring Al-Qaeda rather then turning them in. They knew the crime that had just been committed, which Muslims were against, but the Taliban refused.
The Taliban and Al-qaeda perverted and manipulated the religion and many people for their personal greedy gains and they will live the rest of eternity in hell.
As for the war in Iraq, this had nothing to do with 9/11 because as everyone knows Saddam, held that country with a ironfist and was it was secular, fascist state. Saddam wouldn't allow any terrorists to reside in his country, in fact he's known to have executed many terrorists. The War of Iraq, that 70% of Americans, were against was just a vendetta and Junior Bush doing what George Bush didn't complete. The removal of Saddam Hussein.
2007-01-06 15:27:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If 9/11 didn't happen,we would probably not be at war.
2007-01-06 15:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
No, even if it didn't happen, the war has cost many live to be pointlessly lost. I do think that 9-1-1 was the inspiration for revenge against the muslims. September 11, 2001 had killed many people's loved ones.
2007-01-07 17:41:51 · answer #4 · answered by Aiwo10 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I personally don't support it either way. Have we gotten justice at all for the killings at 9-11? So why are we in Iraq or the middle east? It makes no sense. They say that Osama was the head of the terrorism and plane attacks. So how did we find Saddam first. He should've been a lot harder to catch. He was a leader of a whole country. Osama was just a leader of a group of terrorists. If we were more focused on finding Osama, I might be more yielding. But a lot of our soldiers have been killed.
2007-01-06 15:27:49 · answer #5 · answered by Donovan G 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If 9-11 didn't happen we would not be at war. Bush's whole platform was reform on Wallstreet and corporate scandals also economic stimulace through tax cuts. War was never on the agenda in 2000.
2007-01-06 15:15:19 · answer #6 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If there was still a war if it never happened.. HELL YES, I would definately support the war, The thing is I support anything where we as american soldiers are at, if we didn't support it it would almost be like we are fighting just to fight.. what I have to say to people who don't support the war or the troops is this "If you don't support the troops, feel free to satnd in front of them because they are fighting for the freedom in which right now you are enjoying"
2007-01-06 15:48:29 · answer #7 · answered by kalynn h 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
BushCo planned to attack Iraq BEFORE 9 / 11 happened ! Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9 / 11. Most of the hijackers were Saudis....Anyway you look at it, the war is wrong. It's all about money and power, not helping the Iraqi people. It's about oil....
2007-01-06 15:17:47 · answer #8 · answered by Smelly Cat 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't support this war even with 9-11 so my answer all the way around it NO.
2007-01-06 15:07:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anne A 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It sounded like a good idea at first. We lost a lot that day, on September 11th. Every American felt as though the terrorist that did this must pay for it. But now it has gone on for too long. We need our men and women back home. I don't think Bush will ever be satisfied.
2007-01-06 15:16:14 · answer #10 · answered by pam1212_2000 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Which war are you referring to; Afghan, Iraq, War on Terror, ...?PEOPLE!!! Where have you been? Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. I did not endorse going into Iraq to start with. The justification of going into Iraq would be similar to stopping illegal Mexican/Central American immigration by invading Canada or Cuba!
2007-01-06 15:17:42 · answer #11 · answered by mike s 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋