English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

they annoy me as there are loads of them that drive their kids to the private school near where i work. i'm not insulting women drivers as i'm one myself, but, they drive these massive 4x4's, and they're either too ignorant or incapable to park them properly and it really annoys me! if you can't/can't be bothered to park your 4x4 properly, then get a mini!!! thats what i think anyway. sorry, i didnt answer your question, i just needed a little rant.!!!

2007-01-06 06:20:39 · answer #1 · answered by Sianny 3 · 0 0

How the hell can some human beings not blame the mummy for this? No 8 year previous baby is conscious the F-be conscious and different swears without listening to it another position, merely about consistently at abode. If the baby is in public and hears some punks utilizing those words, the mummy might want to teach him that it truly is inaccurate to apply them. also, little youngsters like those study violent habit from television or probably relatives violence interior the loved ones. the mothers and fathers favor to censor what crap the baby is gazing, and if there's a relatives challenge, they prefer to both get over it, or divorce. A 8-year-previous boy would not favor to stay in that style of surroundings. If there is any blame right here, all of it is going to the guardian. talking of the daddy, the position is he? i'm very curious as to the position he's even as all it truly is happening. This baby needs some help. He needs to ascertain a counselor or a psychiatrist to ascertain out what's incorrect with the baby's head, what's incorrect such as his loved ones, or in all likelihood both. If those issues are not addressed, he will strengthen as a lot as be an complete psychopath, and may want to might want to be contained in penitentiary. "nicely, you in all likelihood deserved it"?? Are you kidding me? She acts as if what he did change into not something, and he were given punished sufficient. that child needs to be taken faraway from her, as straight away as achievable. That female would not should call herself a mom, a lot less a good mom.

2016-12-01 22:18:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It is the same in the states too . Women who stay at home whose husbands (who would never allow their "woman" to have an real accomplishments in their own lives) think their wife and the kid are safer in a tank. These are vehicles these women don't need. They are bored housewives and it makes them feel important to substitute driving their kids to school for real quality time with their kids. Trust me they can not spell environmentalist much less think about the impact of these vehicles.

The worst part is in the parking lots of the school. When I had to pick my nephews up from preschool these women would block the driveways leading in and out and stop these vehicles side beside to socialize and ignored everyone trying to get their attention to move.

2007-01-07 06:50:57 · answer #3 · answered by CAE 5 · 0 0

Most independednt scientists are now in agreement that human contribution to adverse enviromental changes is insignificant.

Nothing can be done to prevent this natural cycle.

The 4x4 issue is one of many excuses for the governments divide and conquer and stealth tax programmes.

The real damage done by irresponsible drivers taking unnecessary journeys is choking up the roads,making everyones life a misery and giving brown another excuse for the latest automatic toll stealth tax.The same technology for toll charges will also give blair another way to spy on us.

2007-01-06 06:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Its not just to anoy anyone, but im sure there might be a couple who do it out of spite. I dont think they are doing it JUST to destroy the enviroment. Im thinking we should all walk. Because driving 300 yards does less damage than driving 300 miles.

2007-01-06 06:18:17 · answer #5 · answered by Jack P 3 · 1 0

They cannot possibly let their little darlings walk to school. The roads are unsafe! There are far too many 4x4s out there.....particularly the ones driven by women who can barely control them (or see over the steering wheel).

2007-01-06 22:36:04 · answer #6 · answered by david f 5 · 0 0

i dont care if they drove them in a monster truck as long as they drive from point a to point b and back in 1 piece without having the 'i'm the king of the road, all bow before me' mentality i see so much of on the road....suv or no suv.

2007-01-06 09:04:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They're trying to attract the 'shermanator'

2007-01-06 06:15:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pehaps they put in to 2wheel drive and r then as eco friendly as any other2 wheel drive vehicle?

2007-01-06 06:27:26 · answer #9 · answered by charles999450 2 · 0 0

Yep and its working by the looks of things

2007-01-06 06:16:29 · answer #10 · answered by Scatty 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers