If there is evidence? Would you believe?

Question

http://www.creationevidence.org

This is an entire website with scientifically supported evidence on the subject of creation.

http://www.creationevidence.org/cemframes.html

It really makes you think if you look at it with an open mind.

http://www.creationevidence.org/scientific_evid/evidencefor/evidencefor.html

Just look at the facts! It is supported by too many provable facts to be "made up" by 1 man!

Answer 1

The problem is getting some people to look at it with an open mind.

Most people that don't believe won't because it would cause them to have to change the life style they are living

Answer 2

Well, as long as you don't know anything about evolution, and your "open mind" isn't bothered by the facts of the matter and the overall basic dishonesty of these propaganda sites.

Now, if there were evidence for creation, I certainly would be interested in looking it over, and if there were enough, I certainly would change my mind. But every time another site like this comes along falsely claiming to have such evidence, I become less and less inclined to bother even looking. That's not closed-mindedness, it's basic common sense. If I make a fist and punch you in the nose, and do it 200 times in a row, you should expect I'm going to do it again the 201st time that I make a fist, and you're not being narrow-minded if you try to avoid it.

I hope that helps you to better understand these things. Good luck.

Answer 3

A scientific theory must account for all the evidence, not just samples cherry-picked out of context for a certain dogma. For a more well-rounded scientific approach to this topic, I suggest you check out http://www.talkorigins.org. They have forums to discuss both sides of the issues, but FAQs and webpages that sum up answers to frequent questions.

Answer 4

You're right, it wasn't made up by one man, it was "made up" by many people.

Your right, it can be convincing... until you study actual science and see that this site is full of lies and distortions. Every time a biologist debates a creationist, the creationist loses.

Here's a huge problem I found within 45 seconds:
"According to the theory of evolution, "all life originated from a super explosion," known as the Big Bang"
Do they understand the difference between cosmology and biology? Doesn't look like it.

Answer 5

I knew from the start that I would not go in with an open mind, but I'm trying as best as I can.... I hope that I'd believe if there was evidence, but I'd trust a god to see that a person who doesn't follow it can still be a good person.

Answer 6

Wooly mammoths from Noah's Ark LOLThe events prior to the birth of Man are of little relevance; they all culminated with Man's rise to power; the new ruler (if there ever was another) of the Earth. It's our time brother, don't bother with the semantics.

Answer 7

no so thay have got a creation fairy tale museam in texas as well no wonder the usa is screwed up that and the kentucky one as well it makes the usa look like a joke all round the world

Answer 8

If you have evidence, you do not need to believe.

Unfortunately, your site contains NO EVIDENCE, but there are a few flights of what can only be called conjecture - at best.

Answer 9

I can't wait to see this...

Any site that uses the terms "macroevolution" and "evolutionist" is a site that I must laugh at.
Try reading research by real scientists.

Answer 10

it doesn't make you look at it with an open mind. It's all lies fabricated by fundamentalists.