human cloning is a sexual reproduction just like virus,why religions against science to prove somethin?

Question

why science doesn't try at leat one experiment to find out what will happen with human cloning.
if religious believe that this is against god will ,on what they depend by their speech?

asexual (one word)

i did a typing mistake in the question and for the seconed time it is asexual...not sexual
and am sorry .....you don't forgive me for that mistake :))

Answer 1

your question got two parts:

1. why science doesn't try at leat one experiment to find out what will happen with human cloning.

answer: there are many adventrist scientist who are willing to do human cloning. but not aurthorized by govt, mainly due to religious people pressure and fear of change and fear of un-seen. always people got scarred of thinking of new thing and experiencing of new thing. i hope one day scientist were allow to do test clonning and allowed to create humans from clonning.

2.if religious believe that this is against god will ,on what they depend by their speech?

here i want to tell you a logical point. if humans are created by god, and if humans are freed/aurthorized by god to do what they want, and to think what they can, and to speak what they can. then whatever a human mind can think, can speak , can do, is directly aurthorized by god and certified by god.
e.g we invented processor(used in pcs), suppose a processor with clock speed of 3.0 GHtz, if it performs from 0-3.0 GHtz, we can say its normal processor function. also it supposed to perform at 0-3.0 GHtz. its normal. also its performance must be and should be labelled as "normal processing". even it perform under load at bit elevated speeds like 3.5 , or even 4.00 GHtz, it should be considered as " pre-designed" performance. and all that performance should be taken as normal and not defying any will or its designer/inventor.

any doubt in it ?

now just think about humans, what humans are capable of doing or what they can do at the maximum (elevated performance) must be "accordring to wills of designer i.e god"

so whats humans capable of doing or can do, all is falling under gods design and nothing is wrong or nothing could be against gods will.

if you can believe that a 386 pc can start working and processign like a "super computer" only then it will go against wills of its designer. can you believe on it ???

Answer 2

Woah! You are really twisting the facts to make christian sound bad. Taking virus reproduction and comparing that with cloning doesn't work that way.

Cloning is a pretty gray spot for chrisians since it doesn't really meantion direct commands about that in the bible. After all, it was way before the time.

I will say this however, what are the benefits of cloning? There's few, but from studying stuff like that, i think the cons tend to outweigh. You can do the reserch yourself if you wish. Just so you know, many people besides christians are against the idea, perhaps even more people than those who are.

Answer 3

There is a tree, that once was planted in Paradise and was only as a decoration no one could eat of shush tree, by God command?, but Eve, was tempted to eat of the tree by the devil, and the original sin will surface. The tree is the tree of good and evil Knowledge as well that of the secrets of Life, so if you think there is a been on this earth human or non-Human capable to deciphered the code of such Secrets, will he think he is a God, or will he try to convince you that he is?, and in the other hand why did God wanted to do something like that?, perhaps to keep the secret out way from Evil?, so why give Evil the chance any way, do you think Evil is a good Guy?, a good Gay maybe Hum???, but good I certainly doubt it.

Answer 4

Health aspects

The success rate of cloning has been low: Dolly the sheep was born after 277 eggs were used to create 29 embryos, which only produced three lambs at birth, only one of which lived, Dolly. Seventy calves have been created from 9,000 attempts and one third of them died young; Prometea took 328 attempts, and, more recently, Paris Texas was created after 400 attempts. Notably, although the first clones were frogs, no adult cloned frog has yet been produced from a somatic adult nucleus donor cell.

At present, the main objection to human cloning is that the cloned individual may be biologically damaged, due to the inherent unreliability of its origin; for example, researchers currently are unable to safely and reliably clone non-human primates.

However, many believe that as cloning research and methods improve, concerns of safety and reliability will no longer be an issue. However, it must be pointed out that this has yet to occur, and may never occur. Rudolph Jaenisch, a professor at Harvard, has pointed out that we have become more efficient at producing clones which are still defective (Development Dynamics. Volume 235, pages 2460-2469. 2006). Other arguments against cloning come from various religious orders (believing cloning violates God's will or the natural order of life), and a general discomfort some have with the idea of "meddling" with the creation and basic function of life. This unease often manifests itself in contemporary novels, movies, and popular culture, as it did with numerous prior scientific discoveries and inventions. Various fictional scenarios portray clones being unhappy, soulless, or unable to integrate into society. Furthermore, clones are often depicted not as unique individuals but as "spare parts," providing organs for the clone's original (or any non-clone that requires replacement organs). Clones could also become targets for hate groups.

Answer 5

Cloning is not sexual reproduction.

Sexual reproduction is a gift from God, and any tampering with that gift is a grave sin.

That includes trying to "play God" by creating human life through cloning.

.

Answer 6

cloning is not the same as twins, they still have problems with it because they are not taking the genes from a new cell they are taking it from a cell that has already multiplied several times, and when that happens there is genetic change, dolly wasn't perfect she had joint,age, immune system problems, and etc. it isn't a perfect science yet and probably will never be

Answer 7

i never find in religion a place asking human not to use mind or brain or thinking
in quran you can see the challenge clear.so if you want to challenge the field is quite open
as well there are levels of morals it is not accepted for a think full human to go beyond
try study religions
see how much that is challenging

Answer 8

We don't need cloning. We have too many people living in poverty as it is. We need to help them ~ not to mention the fact that it's just wronnggg ~ forget religious aspects ~ it's just wrong.

Answer 9

Do you mean asexual? Because that is how viruses and all one-celled organisms reproduce.

Answer 10

PLEASE learn what things are before you spout off.

How can cloning be SEXUAL reproduction?