Very good sentence, totally understandable. The revised sentences above change the meaning of what you wrote fairly significantly. I do not know the thought you truly intended to convey, but as I read that sentence, the word "deprived" seems to be a key word, important to the thought, and neither revision carries that thought.
Be especially careful NOT to use "it's emphasis." That is a glaring grammatical error. ADD: As is "it's traditional meaning." That is the same glaring error.
Also, since there have been two comments on this: "Sense" is a perfectly good word, fitting the sense of the sentence. The first dictionary definition for "sense" is:
Sense: a meaning conveyed or intended
2007-01-06 03:02:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by dollhaus 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's grammatically correct, but it's not really a good way to phrase what you're trying to say. A better way might be:
"For many people, Christmas no longer holds the same sense of tradition it once did."
2007-01-06 10:37:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by lilsnapdragon 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Gramatically, yes, except for the fact that it is not a complete sentance. It's traditional sense of what? I think what you meant to say is, Christmas has been deprived of it's traditional meaning.
2007-01-06 10:46:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by IamBatman 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
It's grammatically correct, but not particularly good English. To keep Christmas as the subject, something like
Christmas has changed it's emphasis from a religious to secular holiday.
2007-01-06 10:37:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sounds all right to me! Perhaps 'meaning' instead of 'sense'?
2007-01-06 10:37:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i might put meaning in the place of sense, bu otherwise, well done!
2007-01-06 17:38:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tangy & Cherry 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's good for me.
2007-01-06 10:37:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Superdog 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, well done.
2007-01-06 10:36:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋