English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

No, because we were responsible much of the political unrest in Iran. The CIA in the 1950's orchestrated the murder of their democratically elected president then put in the American friendly Shah. Iran has the right to have nuclear power as much as Israel does.

2007-01-06 02:30:01 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 3 0

I honestly cannot believe how inhumane some people are, the ones who agreed to nuking Iran. What has Iran ever done to the US? The US made Iran its slave, sucking its resources, building bases in the country. It's so easy for people to say these kinds of things because you don't even think foreigners are even human.

2007-01-06 11:19:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do you understand what the political repurcussions of a U.S. nuclear attack on any country would be? Not to mention ecological reverberations. We don't get to nuke countries we don't like without accepting retalliation. Diplomacy is the only way to go in this horrifyingly dangerous world.

2007-01-06 10:31:25 · answer #3 · answered by mrs. johnson 1 · 3 0

No.

I think we should stop trying to manipulate, cheat, or steal other countries out of all the world's resources, and put some REAL money and effort into finding renewable sources for energy.

2007-01-06 12:31:37 · answer #4 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 0 0

right and we should have nuke anybody else that showed signs of attaining an arsenal of mdw's. pakistan would have been my first choice. in fact, there are many other reasons we should have nuked many other countries. nuke everybody that messes with the good old usa. we should just nuke somebody suddenly just to scare hell out of the other players. do like count vlad (dracula) did when he facing an invasion in his kingdom in romania -- impale thousands on poles along the route the invaders approached and show them what they were facing. the invaders turned back. but the fear of god in these wanna be kings and dictators.

2007-01-06 10:35:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No. "Nuking" any nation would lead to enormous environmental and diplomatic complications. While it seems to be a simple solution, it would create more problems than it solves.

2007-01-06 10:31:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Theree was no real reason to. Using nuclear weapons is a serious decision, and should not be taken lightly. It's not like they're a threat to more than our egos.

2007-01-06 10:32:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I like the Golden Rule - Do unto others as you would have done unto you.

I really wonder why we all can't just be good neighbors and get along no matter what your color, sex, or religion.

2007-01-06 10:37:18 · answer #8 · answered by Jennifer E 2 · 1 0

We should nuke that entire region of the world, it would solve alot of problems- make sure to get Israel too.

2007-01-06 10:29:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Get real. What do you honestly think that would have accomplished except more world conflict. Sepo's!

2007-01-06 11:12:15 · answer #10 · answered by Techno 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers