Big fan of american money are you?
2007-01-05 19:34:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Laptop Jesus 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think that the phrase should be removed, because we all don't believe in god or trust in him. It is an insult to atheist everywhere. I can think for myself. I know right from wrong. I am not so weak minded that I need a god or bible to tell me these things. Could you imagine how christians would react if it said "In satan we trust". Just as they wouldn't want the satanist image forced on them, I don't like the christian image forced on me. I consider it just as foolish. Why should we as atheist have this image of a belief in god forced on us when the government is supposed to be secular? Why was the separation of church and state not brought up when money was being minted?
2007-01-05 20:15:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Danny 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ya, what god? Would you sell your soul for a jingal of coins on the bottom of a begger's can. Cosmicly speaking, even a million dollars is only a half cent ring on some distant planet. Why not say in the Christian God we trust- cause Rome trust's in the antichrist's almighty dollar!
2007-01-05 19:44:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by CaveGoat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All religions hide the fact that for thousands of years God was always considered to be a woman called Goddess. Would you trust a god who changes genders?
2007-01-05 19:37:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by liberty11235 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
NOTE: Research suggests that the God that the US Money refers to is not the Christian God at all, rather the Money God refers to the He/She/It as a "Divine Providence". This is what Thomas Jefferson spoke about, and infact, for those of you who do not know, Washington D.C. the City was actually built in relation to the stars and is aligned with America's one and only Godess.... you can find this info at the sources website below.
And on the Legal tender of the U.S. One Dollar bill you will find in Latin:
"E PLURIBUS UNUM", meaning "Out of many, One." *
"ANNUIT COEPTIS", means "He/She/It has approved our Beginnings." *
"NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM", is interpreted to mean "New Order for the Ages (To Come)." *
Much Peace, Love & Light,
Scott Bruno
* E(x) Pluribus Unum - does not mean "One nation from many people", but "Out of the many, one" representing how the Original Thirteen Colonies came together under one flag, making one out of many. Virgil originally coined it describing how many colors coming together formed one single color.
* Annuit Coeptis - does not mean "God has approved our undertakings". The phrase comes from annuere (to approve) in the third person singular - annuit. Coeptis follows coeptum which comes from the verb coeptere, translating as beginnings or undertakings. There is no Deus here;, rightly translated it just says "He/She/It has approved our beginnings". We must remember also that the Founding Fathers of the United States had Deist-leaning views, so more likely, the He/She/It is Divine Providence of which Jefferson speaks about, rather than the Christian God.
* Novus Ordo Seclorum does not mean "New World Order" or "New Order for the World" or anything with World in it. (That would be Novus Ordo Mundi). Seclorum is the plural genitive of saeculum meaning century, age or period of time. "Novus" is not best left as "New" but "A New thing". So, the appropriate, albeit widely disregarded, translation, would be "A New Order for the Ages [to Come]", signifying the change from an oppressive Monarchy to a Constitutional Republic.
Capitam nostram e cavum amoveamus atque proficiamus.
2007-01-05 19:52:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by caliwebman 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
In myseLf i TrusT
2007-01-05 19:47:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by rien 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, and all others pay cash. Just kidding. God alone can be trusted because God alone is perfect, infallible, omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent.
2007-01-05 19:40:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by utuseclocal483 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course. Nothing and no one else is worthy of our trust but God.
God is light and in him there is no darkness at all.
Aunt Mom - he did show his face when he was born in Bethlehem...
2007-01-05 19:35:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If he is real, I trust him completely.
If he is not real, I trust the ideal I have of him in my head.
2007-01-05 19:37:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Memnoch 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
TRUST NO ONE ! is what it should say !
2007-01-05 19:41:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by baddog 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should all trust him.
2007-01-05 19:36:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋