Just curious, how many people would actually join a world wide revoloution against the current political trends regarding war, workers rights, personal freedom etc.
2007-01-05 18:08:38 · 10 answers · asked by polynesiachick 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
That's okay, the FBI can investigate if they wish it does state a question of CURIOSITY, NOT a declaration. By the way does the FBI also investigate all of the anti-Bush comments and anti-war comments made on here as well??????
2007-01-06 11:42:28 · update #1
nah to busy watching tv. but seriously i dont think many would actually get off their butts and do I know i wouldn't.
2007-01-05 18:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Revolutions are begun by one person with an ideal, but when the masses join, it takes on a life of its own.
There is no need for a revolution in any of the eurocentric controlled places.
Life is easy for the vast majority and while we fret if Jonny doesn't have enough for his eduction and still buy a new car all in all we have it good.
LAWS. Change things by laws, oh how soon the world forgets that laws led us into world wars, and can be passed to control people who live by the law!
Talk of a revolution is killing brother, father , mother or sister in this day and age as everyone has a relative who works for government and supports it.
No matter how hard the conditions people will survive, work for low wages, stab a fellow worker in back to gain favor with boss.
This period in history of vast affluence by eurocentric masses has , as far as history goes, been of a very short duration and been finaced by exploiting lesser peoples.
Lesser people who throw rocks at tanks and get killed, or bombed and called Collateral damage while we sit and mention Revolutions in front of our PC's.
No country is worth dying for today as no country has leadership worthy of dying for.
It is better to be a mercenary in an all volunteer military than some dumb shmuck working for a living.
2007-01-06 02:45:06 · answer #2 · answered by theooldman 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The FBI are investigating you now as you speak,if you always wanted a folder;now you have one.
2007-01-06 11:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, its time for another tea party. in the 1770s they revolted over a 2% tax. Today we are paying up to 50% to federal, state and local governments, not including wasted hours and dollars trying to comply.
2007-01-06 02:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would support a bloodless revolution that came about through laws signed and enacted by the people to control the dominant regime. I would not support violence, nor would I react in violence, unless it came knocking upon my door.
2007-01-06 02:11:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I would, depending on who's leading it and the amount of violence used.
2007-01-06 03:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by Simon 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
where ya been? thats been going on for 2000+ years...
2007-01-06 02:10:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
N O!!!! Don't want to die before my time!!!
2007-01-06 12:25:50 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would.....Preemptive war ???? Give me a break !!!
2007-01-06 02:32:20 · answer #9 · answered by Frann 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why?
2007-01-07 03:07:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋